Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toys 'R' Us Facing Criticism Over Denying New Year Baby Prize Due to Mother's Residency
Fox News ^ | January 06, 2007 | AP

Posted on 01/06/2007 9:45:07 AM PST by CrawDaddyCA

NEW YORK — Toys "R" Us Inc. has come under fire for denying a Chinese-American infant a $25,000 savings bond prize in a contest for the New Year's first baby because the company said the girl's mother is not a legal U.S. resident.

The company's decision — which came less than a month after it opened its first mainland China store, in Shanghai — has infuriated some Chinese-American advocates.

Yuki Lin was born at the stroke of midnight at New York Downtown Hospital, according to hospital officials. She won a random drawing held to break a tie with two other babies entered in the contest, Toys "R" Us spokeswoman Kathleen Waugh said.

The Wayne, N.J.-based company had said the prize would go to the first American baby born in 2007.

Although promotional materials called for "all expectant New Year's mothers" to apply for the contest, Waugh said eligibility rules required babies' mothers to be legal residents. Many sweepstakes have such requirements, Waugh said.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: alien; anchorbaby; criminal; illegal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: CrawDaddyCA
We need to pass a law that states children born in the US to foreign parents are NOT Americans!

Hopefully Toys R Us stands up to this woman. Then again our leaders are already working towards giving our social security to the illegal filth, what's another $25k?
21 posted on 01/06/2007 10:19:42 AM PST by callofduty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
Describe the "punishment" if you would please and then tell us how the baby knows it's being punished.

Actually, I think he was being sarcastic.

22 posted on 01/06/2007 10:24:29 AM PST by yhwhsman ("Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small..." -Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA
Some Chinese-American advocates say the company's decision smacks of second-class citizenship.

Actually, it doesn't, because the mother wasn't a citizen of any class.

23 posted on 01/06/2007 10:28:26 AM PST by psychoknk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartAZ
The only mistake here was announcing a winner before checking the qualifications.

The way I read it the mistake was made here.

She won a random drawing held to break a tie with two other babies entered in the contest

They should have confirmed illegibility before she was placed in the drawing.

24 posted on 01/06/2007 10:34:19 AM PST by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
If the sweepstakes rules require the winners' parents be U.S. citizens, it would be illegal to award the prize to the child of a non-citizen. With sweepstakes, you are talking about legal requirements, not technicalities or being nice.
25 posted on 01/06/2007 11:13:29 AM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
So the baby is an American citizen, but the mother is not, so punish the baby?

It's not like the baby knows what the hell's going on. Maybe the baby can sue them when she/he gets of age :O

26 posted on 01/06/2007 11:40:51 AM PST by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA

I agree.


27 posted on 01/06/2007 12:26:30 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartAZ
The only mistake here was announcing a winner before checking the qualifications.

I agree, and that is why I feel the money should go to the first baby, or maybe even both. Kind of reminds of the guy who had won down at the casino on Florida, where after celebrating with him over his winning, came up to him and told him he had not won because of a mechanical error. (he eventually got the money)

As far the many people complaining that she is an illegal, I never saw anything that mentioned that is the case. She could have been over here as a student, or maybe the wife of a student, studying at one of our universities, perfectly legal to be here in the states. Maybe not a legal resident, but still, she is not an illegal.

28 posted on 01/06/2007 5:28:42 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

And you were right! (And I did wait.)


29 posted on 01/07/2007 5:12:41 PM PST by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA

Contact: www.toysrusinc.com


30 posted on 01/07/2007 5:41:00 PM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative cat; BunnySlippers; CrawDaddyCA; GeorgiaDawg32; DoughtyOne; upchuck; rawhide; ...

January 07, 2007

Under pressure from the Chinese American community, Toys 'R' Us has reinstated a $25,000 prize awarded to a local New Year's baby. NY1's Cindi Avila filed the following report.

"She's the first baby born, so everything in the future should go smoothly for her," said Yan Zhu Liu through a translator.

But since Liu's daughter Yuki Lin was born at the stroke of midnight on New Year's Day in Lower Manhattan things haven't exactly been smooth sailing; a roller coaster is more like it. Yuki Lin was declared the first baby of the year and the winner of a Babies R' Us sweepstakes, a $25,000 savings bond intended to help pay for a college education.

But when the company got wind that the baby's mom may be an illegal immigrant, the prize went to a Georgia newborn instead.

"This is particularly troublesome given the history of Asian-Americans in the United States, where we have been seen as invisible or treated as perpetual foreigners or second class citizens," said Liz OuYank of the Organization of Chinese Americans. "And here, clearly, she was born in the United States, is a U.S. citizen and the award should be based on simply that."

It turns out where the baby is born isn't the only factor in determining who wins the prize. According to the official rules, the mother must be a legal U.S. resident. That news didn't sit well with people NY1 spoke with.

"I don't think that's right, because it's just about whether the kid was the first born in the United States," said one New Yorker.

Several Chinese organizations put a call out for Babies 'R' Us to return the award to the 6 and a half pound girl, and everyone NY1 spoke with seemed to agree.

In the end, it looks Babies R Us heard the community's call.

On Saturday, the company released a statement saying "We deeply regret that this sweepstakes became a point of controversy. As a result, we have decided to award all three babies in the grand prize pool a $25,000 savings bond."

That means Yuki Lin, the Georgia baby and one born in Bay Shore, New York all win.

"I think it's a great idea that they are giving the bond to the baby's mother even though she isn't a U.S. resident," said a New Yorker.

When NY1 visited the baby and her parents Monday, through a translator Yuki Lin's father said, "the baby will bring us much more luck this year."

It looks like that luck is already in effect.

- Cindi Avila


31 posted on 01/07/2007 5:47:48 PM PST by Howlin (Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA
In today's society, nobody has the time to read the ENTIRE rules. Each sentence (even amongst politicians, even with the Constitution) is taken in isolation, as if the other sentences don't exist.

If one sentence says you must be a legal resident of the United States, and another sentence says ALL expectant mothers can apply, guess what some lawyer will concoct?

-PJ

32 posted on 01/07/2007 5:47:50 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Read my post above this one.


33 posted on 01/07/2007 5:48:11 PM PST by Howlin (Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

yeah, I just saw it. Damn


34 posted on 01/07/2007 5:50:29 PM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Somewhere else I won't shop.

I'm tired of all this PC caving.


35 posted on 01/07/2007 5:51:13 PM PST by Howlin (Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
so punish the baby

What punish? It's a prize. A freebie.

36 posted on 01/07/2007 5:52:36 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Read #31.


37 posted on 01/07/2007 5:53:33 PM PST by Howlin (Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ninergold3
Another thing wrong with our system. It's a sad day when a person can sue and win - only because it's cheaper for to settle than go through the system.

Moreover, federal judges are "underpaid" at six figures because the law profession is getting wealthy off of this system.

38 posted on 01/07/2007 5:54:01 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Well, I sent an email to the CEO saying how wonderful it was they were sticking to their guns..Lot of good that did, huh? LOL..

sw

39 posted on 01/07/2007 5:57:17 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife ("One Nation, One Standard")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: spectre

Disgusting, isn't it?


40 posted on 01/07/2007 5:58:52 PM PST by Howlin (Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson