Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats push for Alaska drilling ban
AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/5/07 | H. Josef Hebert - ap

Posted on 01/05/2007 2:21:09 PM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last
To: OBXWanderer
"When they finally have to walk home to their cold, dark house, they just might change their attitude on 'BIG OIL'."

During construction of the Pipeline in the 70's, a popular bumper sticker was "LET THE BASTARDS FREEZE IN THE DARK." If the shoe fits in 2007, so be it...

81 posted on 01/05/2007 8:16:22 PM PST by redhead (...frammin' at the jim-jam, frippin' at the krotz...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

She spoke with a forked-tongue.


82 posted on 01/05/2007 8:20:13 PM PST by RWB Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
He hasn't owned any for 6 years.

I guess that explains his overthrowing the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam in Iraq...

83 posted on 01/05/2007 8:51:35 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Truth is Alaska doesn't have a dog in this fight. Drill or not, the revenue to Alaska is hardly worth the trouble.

Are you kidding? Most Alaskans, both Republicans and Democrats strongly support drilling.

The revenue from oil drilling has lifted many communities out of the stone age. Without it they have virtually nothing.

84 posted on 01/05/2007 8:58:19 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

What is so galling is that the eniviros have convinced the public that nuke energy, any oil drilling anywhere, is just horrid and offensive. It doesn't make a difference that many nations are doing just the above. Including the EU nations. Not drilling in the Gulf, off the NE coast, off Fla. and Ca. is criminal. It would ace out OPEC and keep us independent for centuries. As for being addicted, try telling car owners that. And what about coal? Oh no, not that ugly stuff. So we lose out on all those resources because many have swallowed the lie that any other type of energy but the sun is just evil!!


85 posted on 01/05/2007 9:03:04 PM PST by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

What is so galling is that the eniviros have convinced the public that nuke energy, any oil drilling anywhere, is just horrid and offensive. It doesn't make a difference that many nations are doing just the above. Including the EU nations. Not drilling in the Gulf, off the NE coast, off Fla. and Ca. is criminal. It would ace out OPEC and keep us independent for centuries. As for being addicted, try telling car owners that. And what about coal? Oh no, not that ugly stuff. So we lose out on all those resources because many have swallowed the lie that any other type of energy but the sun is just evil!!


86 posted on 01/05/2007 9:03:13 PM PST by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
No mosquito blood for oil!

Amazing.

87 posted on 01/05/2007 10:43:45 PM PST by Mr. Buzzcut (metal god ... visit The Ponderosa .... www.vandelay.com ... DEATH BEFORE DHIMMITUDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
I think we may be in the process. Not quite past tense just yet.
Meanwhile, the bridge to nowhere and not a single veto of a spending program in 6 yrs.
88 posted on 01/06/2007 6:42:04 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Jorge

Probably a valid point if ANWR were part of Alaska. But it's FedGov territory and has nothing to do with Alaska.


89 posted on 01/06/2007 9:24:21 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"Drill Interns - Not Anwar!"


90 posted on 01/06/2007 9:38:27 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So much for energy independence.


91 posted on 01/06/2007 9:39:36 AM PST by JHBowden (President Giuliani in 2008! Law and Order. Solid Judges. Free Markets. Killing Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Then 86% of Nevada has nothing to do with Nevada?


92 posted on 01/06/2007 9:42:54 AM PST by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: MARTIAL MONK

Vast stretches of land acquired by FedGov beyond the original Thirteen States have remain under FedGov admin and control. The various States these territories happen to be inside of have little to say or do about it. For example, ANWR is inside the boundary of the State of Alaska but Alaska does not administer ANWR nor will Alaska see anything more than 10% of the tax revenue. The 90% will go to DC and be reallocated to FedGov projects mostly in other States. They say Alaska is the largest State, yet Alaska is far down the list because FedGov has retained most of it.


93 posted on 01/06/2007 9:53:01 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

How is it that we would expect you to put some "Bush's Fault" dig in this thread. I guess it is simply you, doing what you do best.


94 posted on 01/06/2007 9:56:06 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (MAYNARD BLAZEJEWSKI For President '08 (The "true" conservative choice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: phillyfanatic

"And what about coal? Oh no, not that ugly stuff. So we lose out on all those resources because many have swallowed the lie that any other type of energy but the sun is just evil!!"

I was driving my "eeeevil" car around the other day, when I had to stop at a railroad track in the liberal city of Madison, WI. Car after car after car filled with coal rolled by.

It warmed the cockles of my widdow heart, LOL!


95 posted on 01/06/2007 10:55:07 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

He deserves the banner.


96 posted on 01/06/2007 11:23:44 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Probably a valid point if ANWR were part of Alaska. But it's FedGov territory and has nothing to do with Alaska.

You're joking right?

I think you need to educate yourself on this topic.

Alaska's people benifit greatly when it comes to jobs, revenue etc. from development of oil reserves in ANWR.

That why over 75% of Alaskans support drilling in ANWR.
Check it out.

http://www.anwr.org/people/people.htm

97 posted on 01/06/2007 5:15:47 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
For example, ANWR is inside the boundary of the State of Alaska but Alaska does not administer ANWR nor will Alaska see anything more than 10% of the tax revenue.

I don't know about your numbers but the fact remains Alaskans will benefit from drilling in ANWR which is why 75% of them support it, which was my original point.

98 posted on 01/06/2007 5:18:07 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Jorge

The situation in Alaska, and in the West, is not at all as you believe. But, we don't need to keep going over this again and again.


99 posted on 01/07/2007 9:13:03 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson