[Dane]

How about you instead make it clear on immigration threads that your statement you've been spewing for months was wrong? Instead of just transitioning to your next talking point in hopes that no one notices?

And what is wrong with stating that 1/3 of the democrat pickups from the 2006 election in the House came from the Tancredo immigration caucus.

Should I behave like a Pravda journalist from old soviet Russia to appease you.

[dirtboy]

And what is wrong with stating that 1/3 of the democrat pickups from the 2006 election in the House came from the Tancredo immigration caucus.

What is wrong is you were claiming that 1/3rd of the Tancredo caucus lost. Until I challenged you to back up your claim.

Should I behave like a Pravda journalist from old soviet Russia to appease you.

How about you quit acting like Dan Rather when caught in a bald-faced lie? And be enough of a person to issue an unconditional correction since you've spread that misconception for some time?

Nah, rail at the people who call you on your misstatements. It's the liberal way.