[dirtboy]

And what is wrong with stating that 1/3 of the democrat pickups from the 2006 election in the House came from the Tancredo immigration caucus.

What is wrong is you were claiming that 1/3rd of the Tancredo caucus lost. Until I challenged you to back up your claim.

Should I behave like a Pravda journalist from old soviet Russia to appease you.

How about you quit acting like Dan Rather when caught in a bald-faced lie? And be enough of a person to issue an unconditional correction since you've spread that misconception for some time?

Nah, rail at the people who call you on your misstatements. It's the liberal way.

[Dane]

What is wrong is you were claiming that 1/3rd of the Tancredo caucus lost. Until I challenged you to back up your claim.

And I corrected that error in reply #35, but even though I corrected you like a good Pravda "journalist" will run with the berating.

[Arizona Carolyn]

I noticed Dane stayed away from this thread the other day. No wonder since it refutes the "closed border types caused the GOP loss" statements from people like Dane and a few others.

The Great Illegal Immigration Myth of '06