To: Jim Robinson
The NARA investigation report said Clinton signed an April 12, 2002, letter designating Berger – and another person whose named is redacted Who is this other person??
I want a name
9 posted on
01/03/2007 11:58:42 PM PST by
Mo1
(YEA, What Onyx said in her tagline !!)
To: Mo1
I'll play: Bruce Lindsey.
14 posted on
01/04/2007 12:02:13 AM PST by
Howlin
(Not voting GOP was like being thirsty but not drinking since the glass is only 75% full ~~SoCalPol)
To: Mo1
What possible reason could there be to "redact" a name from this kind of investigation??
I remember reading that when the Director of the National Archives was informed that Berger was suspected of stealing classified documents, the very first person he called on the phone was.... Bruce Lindsey. And this report comes from the National Archives and Records Administration, which appears to be as corrupt as everything else in Dirty City.
To: Mo1
I bet the redacted name is Hillary.
To: Mo1
WHY IS THE NAME OF THE OTHER PERSON REDACTED???
87 posted on
01/04/2007 4:58:09 AM PST by
OldFriend
(THE PRESS IS AN EVIL FOR WHICH THERE IS NO REMEDY)
To: Mo1
Who is this other person?? An educated guess would be, HILLARY!
137 posted on
01/04/2007 6:40:02 AM PST by
unixfox
(The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
To: Mo1
Richard A. Clarke? Jamie Gorelick?
197 posted on
01/04/2007 8:44:41 AM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
(Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
To: Mo1
To: Mo1
Name redacted for security purposes. That makes it someone higher than Berger. Definitely a Dem though.
To: Mo1
his name was redacted... can't you read?
teeman
To: Mo1
311 posted on
01/04/2007 8:31:47 PM PST by
weegee
("Vote Obama - For More Ears!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson