Skip to comments.
Airport cab drivers may have licenses suspended for refusing to carry fares
St. Paul Pioneer Press ^
| January 3, 2007
| TAD VEZNER
Posted on 01/03/2007 10:26:53 PM PST by Man50D
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: dennisw
These useless godless Somalis will merely go back to welfare. Which is where they prefer to be. Somalis and Hmong are about the worst immigrants we get. Plus they are all refugees which gives them immediate access to welfare programs and lo lo lo interest SBA loans which they quite often use to engage in fraud and ripping off the USG
Those reasons should qualify them for amnesty through a guest worker program in the eyes of our socialist politicians.
21
posted on
01/03/2007 11:01:08 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: Man50D
The goal of Islam is to do have ordinances based on religous issues by ultimately enforcing Sharia Law. To them religion is the state. The proposed ordinance prevents that from happening. Islam in general and Sharia Law specifically seem incompatible with our Constitution. But allowing cab drivers to make poor economic decisions based on their own conviction is not the same as enforcing Sharai Law.
22
posted on
01/03/2007 11:05:18 PM PST
by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
To: amchugh
Anyway, I have a hard time finding the Muslim prohibition against the consumption of alchohol to be all that offensive when applied by individuals rather than at the state level. I think this country would benefit from a culture of responsible drinking or even one of abstention. After all, look what happens to spider's web building when exposed to drugs or alchohol.
That would be a valid point if their intent was that simplistic. Unfortunately their goal is far greater than merely banning alcohol. Their goal is to enforce Sharia law. They know it would be impossible to enforce all at once so they will settle for incremental ism.
If your goal is to boil the frog you don't put it in a pot of hot water otherwise it will jump out. Instead you place it in cool water and slowly turn up the heat. The frog will not realize the difference until it is too late. Muslims are attempting the same strategy in this country.
23
posted on
01/03/2007 11:08:38 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: Man50D
To: Man50D
That would be a valid point if their intent was that simplistic. Unfortunately their goal is far greater than merely banning alcohol. Their goal is to enforce Sharia law. They know it would be impossible to enforce all at once so they will settle for incremental ism.
If your goal is to boil the frog you don't put it in a pot of hot water otherwise it will jump out. Instead you place it in cool water and slowly turn up the heat. The frog will not realize the difference until it is too late. Muslims are attempting the same strategy in this country.Good observation. Same applies to Keith Ellison and his Muslim wrecking crew. They want to have every Muzz swearing on their damnable Koran whether in court or a Congressional hearing. Muzz are cruising for a lawsuit the first time they are denied
Jihad and expansion of Sharia can be fast and violent or take place slowly as in the USA
25
posted on
01/03/2007 11:25:41 PM PST
by
dennisw
(Allah has no son and no prophet unless a false prophet qualifies)
To: Man50D
Muslim imams support sharia, and I'm sure that a lot of Muslims support it. What I'm not sure of is that the majority of Muslims in this country will support it generations down the line. Our country is good at assimilating foreign cultures. Your slippery slope argument may be relevant, but at 1% of the population, I'm not yet worried about it.
26
posted on
01/03/2007 11:49:42 PM PST
by
amchugh
To: dennisw
Third world immigrants turning Minnesota into a third world state quickly.
All because of our hand-outs.
To: Lijahsbubbe
Catholic and Lutheran resettlement agencies, acting as subcontractors to the U.S. government, sponsored the first groups of Somali refugees to Minnesota in ... www.mcgillreport.org/Rochester%20Immigration.htm - 150k - Cached - Similar pages |
Blame the churches for your state being inundated by primitives. There are Jewish refugee agencies that have no more Russian Jews to sponsor and resettle. So they sponsor others such as Balkan Muslims. Otherwise they would go out of business
28
posted on
01/04/2007 12:06:23 AM PST
by
dennisw
(Allah has no son and no prophet unless a false prophet qualifies)
To: dennisw
A thousand Somalians in Mpls. were protesting the attack on the Islamic terrorists in Somalia the other day.
The picture in the paper was depressing. It looked like a picture from an Arab country.
To: Lijahsbubbe
Bet they keep your firemen busy due to jacking up the heat (undoubtedly paid by welfare) in the winter to near tropical temps and not knowing the dangers of using electric and gas space heaters
30
posted on
01/04/2007 12:20:37 AM PST
by
dennisw
(Allah has no son and no prophet unless a false prophet qualifies)
To: Man50D
Minneapolis is the new France.
To: Man50D
Muslim cabbies refuse to carry alcohol or puppies, Christian pharmacists refuse to provide aboritfacients. Whose ox, eh?
To: Man50D
Who the heck is Tad Vezner, and why is this suggestion "heavy fisted? It seems to me to be badly needed to maintain proper taxi service for air travellers, who are largely business people with an inordinate influence on a city's economy.
More "objectivity" from medidiots.
33
posted on
01/04/2007 1:20:22 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: supercat
Great. So the airport decides not to do business, with another business that doesn't provide adequate service to the airport's customers.
34
posted on
01/04/2007 1:23:39 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: Man50D
35
posted on
01/04/2007 1:27:43 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: Man50D
He added that about a half-dozen people a year were refused transport because they had animals traveling with them, including service animals such as guide dogs. Y'know... I think I'll go into business training seeing-eye pigs. They're very smart and I'll bet they could do about as well as dogs. Plus, it'd be a great test (sting operation) to catch koranimal cabbies who should have their licenses revoked and are already on probation for refusing to carry passengers.
To: amchugh
What I'm not sure of is that the majority of Muslims in this country will support it generations down the line. Our country is good at assimilating foreign cultures. Your slippery slope argument may be relevant, but at 1% of the population, I'm not yet worried about it.
All Muslims are bound by Sharia law otherwise they are subject to the same fate as non Muslims who Muslims consider infidels. It is more than just a slippery slope theory. It is fact they will not assimilate as stated in
Islamic Scholar Warns U.S. of 'Two-Faced' Muslims It is based on a Muslim born and raised in Syria. Our country will be no more effective assimilating Islam than it would have been if it attempted to assimilate Nazism. The fact that you aren't worried is exactly the false sense of security Muslims hope people in this country have until they become aware after it's too late.
37
posted on
01/04/2007 2:18:46 AM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: Man50D
These are the kind of cultural laws that will send the vermin scurrying back into their hellhole countries.
38
posted on
01/04/2007 2:32:39 AM PST
by
tkathy
(Sectarian violence? Or genocidal racists? Which is a better description of islamists?)
To: supercat
Yes, it's a private business, but all taxis operate under licenses granted by the local government with strict operational rules. If you don't comply with the rules, you can lose your license. In St. Paul, the rule regarding fares is very easy to understand:
Sec. 376.11. Regulations. (h) Refusal of service. No driver of a public vehicle shall refuse or neglect to convey any orderly person or persons upon request anywhere in the city, unless previously engaged or unable to do so, provided such person or persons agrees or agree to pay the legal rate of fare.
I fail to see the addendum to this section that says "No driver of a public vehicle shall refuse any orderly person unless such orderly person is carrying unopened containers of alchol."
Licenses to operate taxis are expensive and, in many cities, are scarce and increase in value. Hence, the taxi driver can realize a good profit from selling his license. A person granted a public license that is making a profit from the sale of such license should not have the right to refuse fares for reasons other than cited in the regulation.
Here is the market price for a taxi medallion in NYC:
To: supercat
I would propose something much simpler: if a driver at a taxi stand refuses a fare without good cause ... the driver should forfeit his turn at the front of the line and have to drive around to the back.
I think that is already in place. It opens a can of worms: the Muslim drivers get their way, then redneck drivers can refuse to take blacks, etc.
40
posted on
01/04/2007 8:00:15 AM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson