Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pardon Border Agents Ramos and Compean (14 Days Left to Petition)
Grassfire.org ^

Posted on 01/03/2007 1:21:09 PM PST by Tim Long

The Issue:

Persecuted because they were doing their jobs.… That’s precisely what has happened to two U.S. Border agents who were convicted and sentenced to 11 and 12 year prison terms for shooting a Mexican drug smuggler who had crossed our border illegally and physically assaulted one of the agents.

This outrageous injustice took place near El Paso, Texas—a hotbed of illegal activity, where drug smugglers, and violent gang members illegally crossing from Mexico are often encountered. On February 17, 2005, U.S. Border Ignacio Ramos (a former nominee for border patrol agent of the Year), and Jose Compean attempted to apprehend a fleeing illegal alien at our border.

Today, both are facing 20 year prison terms, and even more outrageous, this same illegal alien is now suing the U.S. for $5 million claiming his civil rights were violated. Click here for the Lou Dobbs report.

Both agents must surrender to federal authorities on January 17, to begin their terms. However, Grassfire.org is calling on the President to pardon them, and is rallying at least 200,000 citizens to sign our petition. Because of the timeliness of this issue, we will electronically deliver all signed petitions, and personal comments about this case directly to the White House.

On December 21, 2007, Grassfire presented nearly 160,000 petitions demanding the full pardon of border agents Ramos and Compean to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-46th), an outspoken supporter of the agents, during a national press conference. Additionally, Grassfire President Steve Elliott appeared on Fox News' Fox and Friends to make a plea for the agents (click here to see Steve's interview). Grassfire is urging ALL members of our team to contact their lawmakers, and the White House demanding these agents be pardoned. To contact the White House, 202-456-1111.

Total signers: 193,500

Your Sponsor: Mr. Tim Long The Petition States: To: President George W. Bush,

As a citizen of the United States I am outraged to learn that two U.S. Border Agents have been convicted of lengthy prison terms for doing their jobs-- pursuing illegal aliens who cross our border, and I’m calling on you to officially pardon them for their actions.

I am even more outraged to learn that this illegal alien (who was attempting to smuggle about 800 pounds of marijuana into our country), was tracked down by a Department of Homeland Security Investigator and granted immunity for his testimony against these two agents!

This is a terrible injustice, and I urge you to use your considerable authority and power to pardon these two agents and right this obvious wrong!

Step #1 -- Sign Here: Title: First Name: Last Name: Address 1: Address 2: City: State: Zip: Country: Phone: Email: Confirm email:

Step #2 -- Your Personal Message: Tell the President in your own words to pardon these agents! (Your comments will be included in your petition to the White House)

Include your subject line here: Subject:

Include your personal comments here: Message to the President (150 characters max):

You have typed characters so far

Step #3 -- Submit Your Petition:

Please email me periodic updates on this issue Allow partner organizations to contact me via email.

Please take a moment and add your name. It costs nothing, your e-mail address will not be sold or given to anyone else without your permission, and it takes less than five minutes of your time.

You must be 18 years of age or older to sign this petition.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; borders; compean; comprehensiveamnesty; illegalaliens; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; injustice; openborders; ramos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: wolfcreek; Last Laugh

Our nation is governed by laws....federal agents cannot kill an unarmed fleeing man. If they couldn't act under the rules, they shouldn't be BP. When they shot at him, they did not know he was smuggling.

People's use of this as a weapon in the political arena is disgusting. They were blatantly wrong, and convicted by a jury of their peers. They turned down a plea bargain that would have saved them the long sentences.

The only reason anyone would support these guys is because they tried to kill a Mexican.....a lot of people's racism is showing on this matter IMO.


21 posted on 01/04/2007 6:12:34 AM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; All
Just getting back to you, had to leave early yesterday. My non-replies were unintentional!

I have not read all your posts yet, but I know that there are cooler heads than mine in this forum. That is why I love it so much.

Well..on to the posts. I am expecting to get flamed.

22 posted on 01/04/2007 6:44:11 AM PST by Last Laugh (We the People are in charge, so let's act like it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
The message is, "Don't Obstruct Justice". Good message, I'd say

Yesterday (OK, today as well), I saw it as "go ahead and cross our Borders, those watching it are not allowed to shoot". Of course, I thought this well before this incident.

23 posted on 01/04/2007 6:47:57 AM PST by Last Laugh (We the People are in charge, so let's act like it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
The only reason anyone would support these guys is because they tried to kill a Mexican.....a lot of people's racism is showing on this matter IMO.

Now, that is just not true. How do you know that I am not a Mexican or related to a Mexican family? As a matter of fact, the Father of my favorite little nephew happens to BE Mexican, from Mexico. I have many Mexican friends here in Texas.

The border patrol agents being charged are MEXICAN. I'll bet they knew a lot more than you seem to think they did. But THEIR word was not good enough. The word of a LAWBREAKER was.

24 posted on 01/04/2007 6:57:05 AM PST by Last Laugh (We the People are in charge, so let's act like it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
We don't want Federales on *this* side of the border.

No, we want much worse. The Mexican army protecting smugglers for instance. They get away with it because WE can't protect our own borders.

25 posted on 01/04/2007 6:58:33 AM PST by Last Laugh (We the People are in charge, so let's act like it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
I think I'll stick with the rule of law. Trial by jury... Due process... It's really a pretty good system. Maybe we should keep

Which means buying a witness with immunity, I guess.

26 posted on 01/04/2007 6:59:27 AM PST by Last Laugh (We the People are in charge, so let's act like it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
Oh for crying out loud..The fleeing man was treated, returned home only to smuggle drugs again..And he has the audacity to want to sue OUR gov't for 5 million dollars?

The obstruction of justice charges are ludicrous. George W. Bush should use his power to pardon these two men, and restore morale to the Border patrol and the American people.

Is he afraid he might offend the Latio movements, who encourage their people to illegally cross our Borders?

To hell with the American people? I don't know what is going on with him anymore..

sw

27 posted on 01/04/2007 7:08:59 AM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife ("One Nation, One Standard")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Last Laugh

So... which cops should be able to just execute anyone they wish... just the federal agents? or should it include state and local cops too?


28 posted on 01/04/2007 7:17:05 AM PST by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1761985/posts

Read this thread and then tell us about the rulr of law.


29 posted on 01/04/2007 7:30:32 AM PST by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: spectre; Last Laugh

Just my opinion.....why would this man's life be so worthless, when far worse criminals are given the same protection by the law that he is, with no public outcry?

I will remind you that they tried to cover the shooting up by making a second trip to the sight to get casings they missed picking up at the time. I will also remind you that they did not know he was smuggling.

They tried to kill a man for a misdemeanor, entering the US illegally. They shot him in the back. That's inexcusable, and they knew it. So should everyone else, unless there is something else besides the facts involved.


30 posted on 01/04/2007 9:40:37 AM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
So... which cops should be able to just execute anyone they wish... just the federal agents? or should it include state and local cops too?

The smuggler was not murdered, he was shot at. He could have been running towards hidden weapons, they do that you know, hide weapons. There are many reasons to shoot at an invader, even fear for your own life.

I do not advocate murder, but I do believe that an alien invader can be shot the same as any other enemy.

31 posted on 01/04/2007 9:48:05 AM PST by Last Laugh (We the People are in charge, so let's act like it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement
DOBBS: You got an idea where that skunk is, Congressman Poe?

One skunk is sitting in the White House, and the other is sitting in the Attorney General's office...

It's unbelievable and disgusting to realize the low level these "leaders" have sunk to...

32 posted on 01/04/2007 10:28:39 AM PST by janetgreen (NO AMNESTY EVER AGAIN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
They tried to kill a man for a misdemeanor, entering the US illegally. They shot him in the back. That's inexcusable, and they knew it. So should everyone else, unless there is something else besides the facts involved.

Your argument makes sense, I'm not saying it doesn't. But overlook my bad writing skills and hear me out past the first two paragraphs, OK?

The Southern Border can be a very dangerous place to patrol because Mexico does not want us to patrol it and neither does the current Administration. Slanted reporting is one method used to keep the Border "clear" for illegal entry.

I witnessed such slanted reporting a few years back when some U.S. Military Personnel got shot at by a "Poor Mexican Goat Herder", and they shot back in self defense. (guess who got in trouble?)

There may very well be circumstances other than the "facts" that were presented - that happens in trials all of the time..red tape inadmissible stuff.

I sat on a jury in a murder case once. After we came to a verdict, We found out a lot of facts that were inadmissible so the jurors "opinion" would not be swayed. (pissed me off, and if the judgment had of been different, I'd have been on the news complaining we were "mislead"). That experience changed my opinion about "fair trials" forever.

The Border Agents shot the guy (whether or not it was in the back is irrelevant, he could have been running towards hidden weapons, you never know)

These Border agents obviously got emotional,angry, not unlike a like we've seen Police Officers do sometimes after a chase. They tried to hide excessive use of their arms, knowing that spelled trouble for them. They are guilty of those offenses.

The witness in the case, IMO, was allowed to insert "facts" that are basically his word against theirs, as far as what "went down".

We are to believe the Border Patrol agents did not know he was smuggling at the time. LOL! Bet they knew him though, bet they knew his M.O., his past..they knew exactly what he was doing, they have been agents a long time.

The Agents are guilty alright. But they deserve a Pardon, because the whole thing smells BEYOND what "facts" were presented. You don't send an Officer to jail for ten years for firing his gun and not killing someone, or not reporting the useage. You fire them.

33 posted on 01/04/2007 10:38:21 AM PST by Last Laugh (We the People are in charge, so let's act like it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin
The message is your going to be tried in a kangaroo court if you do something as politically incorrect as defend yourself against a drug smuggler.

You, of course, know that the agents were convicted for Obstruction of Justice.
Your, "...defend yourself against a drug smuggler." is as dishonest as your fellow agents testimony.

34 posted on 01/04/2007 11:28:56 AM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
"The only reason anyone would support these guys is because they tried to kill a Mexican.....a lot of people's racism is showing on this matter IMO."


YOU WIN! That's the biggest bunch of BS I've heard in a while. You can play that race card all you want but, it makes you look like Sharpton or Jackson. If that's what being an OBL is all about, you guys need to change parties and/or philosophies.
35 posted on 01/04/2007 12:58:23 PM PST by wolfcreek (Please Lord, May I be, one who sees what's in front of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PRND21

Is jury misconduct a good thing? What about prosecutorial musconduct? Two Border Patrol Agent engage in misconduct and you have a problem with that. The judge, the jury and the prosecutor engage in misconduct and that's alright with you. What an interesting twist of logic.


36 posted on 01/04/2007 1:23:09 PM PST by Ajnin (Neca Eos Omnes. Deus Suos Agnoset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Apparently you missed the part about the illegal alien fighting with the agents and then attemtping to shoot them.


37 posted on 01/04/2007 1:30:37 PM PST by Ajnin (Neca Eos Omnes. Deus Suos Agnoset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin
Is jury misconduct a good thing?

No, show me where it happened in this case.

What about prosecutorial musconduct?

No, show me where it happened in this case.

Two Border Patrol Agent engage in misconduct and you have a problem with that.

Uh, yeah. "Misconduct" in this case is Felony Obstruction of Justice.

The judge, the jury and the prosecutor engage in misconduct...

Link, please.
Duh.

38 posted on 01/04/2007 1:33:02 PM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
I'm NOT saying there wasn't a cover up. I'm saying that the punishment doesn't fit the crime.

The man was a known Mexican drug dealer, and was offered immunity (FGS) to testify against OUR officers. We gave him immunity, and he went back to smuggling drugs into our country.

Some people are worth defending more than others. Scum who sell our children drugs are worthless in my book.. I choose to defend our Border Patrolmen over the drug dealer..I'm funny that way..

sw

39 posted on 01/04/2007 1:34:22 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife ("One Nation, One Standard")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

end of the line...............

this will be a major part of the bush legacy if he chooses to let these 2 twist in the wind...........

wait and see


40 posted on 01/04/2007 1:36:34 PM PST by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson