Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JSDude1
Traditional Smaller Governemtn Conservatism is not in conflict with the "Christian right" (though there are more than Christians that discribe themselves as "social conservatives". Don't forget RR was both! Why do we need to pick one over the other: With all due respect lets skip those whom want to divide the conservative movement and pick someone whom can represent ALL forms of RR Conservative..

I agree. Chuck Hagel is a social conservative, just not an extreme social conservative in the mold of Brownback or Santorum. That's why I am encouraging other libertarians to support his candidacy, because he will also appeal to traditional (non-neo) conservatives.
38 posted on 01/03/2007 12:34:32 PM PST by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: MinnesotaLibertarian

Libertarianism has far more in common with classical liberalism than classical conservatism. Modern Libertarian Party core positions have far more in common with the Democrat Party than with the Republican Party.


58 posted on 01/03/2007 1:32:05 PM PST by Wolfstar ("Common sense is not so common." Voltaire, 1764)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian
That's why I am encouraging other libertarians to support his candidacy, because he will also appeal to traditional (non-neo) conservatives.

ML, is it your opinion that FreeRepublic is dominated by neo-cons?

My experience on FreeRepublic (8+ years) tells me that FreeRepublic is dominated by true conservatives, not the Bill Kristal/neo-con types.

Doesn't matter, though. Hagel might be able to raise some money, but he'll never garner any votes in the South, to include Texas.

If Hagel got every Libertarian vote, he'd still finish fourth in a three horse race.

63 posted on 01/03/2007 1:52:08 PM PST by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

they are not "extreme social conservatives". It isn't "extreme" to role back tyranous Judical decisions or the protection of innocent human life which is at the heart of their "social conservatism". (With all due respect.)

Hagle may be a fine man (I don't know), neither is he my senator, but he seems like a compromiser to me, not a true RR Conservative, maybe I am wrong, but I just think there are "BETTER People" out there..(somewhere I hope Conservative "X").!


66 posted on 01/03/2007 1:57:52 PM PST by JSDude1 (www.pence08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

Hagel is a lying, self-serving, backstabbing scumbag who thinks the McCain model, attacking other conservatives to gain the fawning adoration of the liberal press and get extra air-time, will carry him to higher office. I wouldn't piss on him if he were on fire, and I certainly would never vote for the little weasel. I will never vote for any "conservative" that trashes other conservatives just to get invited on TV by the likes of Stephanopoulas or Russert.

F*#K Ch*#k Hagel....I could not hate the slimy traitor more.


PF


67 posted on 01/03/2007 2:00:39 PM PST by PresidentFelon (Reuters Reporter Adam Entous beats his Mother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

...he will also appeal to traditional (non-neo) conservatives.

**
Not this traditional conservative.


84 posted on 01/03/2007 6:41:33 PM PST by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson