Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's bad news no matter how you spin it (Rudy lost his most sensitive campaign docs)
New York Daily News ^ | 3 January 2007 | BEN SMITH and DAVID SALTONSTALL

Posted on 01/03/2007 8:52:27 AM PST by Spiff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
Probably the most sensitive document to his campaign gets lost/stolen/leaked/whatever and he's busy making silly excuses and changing the story as many times as he's changed wives (but not as many times as he's dressed in drag at radical gay group fundraisers). And he wants to be THE national security candidate!!? I mean the guy runs a security company with multi-million dollar contracts and he can't secure his own sensitive documents and didn't properly vett his own staff? This incident strains his credibility on security issues. Well, this and the whole Bernie Kerik thing.
1 posted on 01/03/2007 8:52:32 AM PST by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz; TommyDale

Ping


2 posted on 01/03/2007 8:52:50 AM PST by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

He's toast.


3 posted on 01/03/2007 8:53:18 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Sorry ace, but you got beat up on the other thread and the same thing will happen again.
4 posted on 01/03/2007 8:58:30 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
Sorry ace, but you got beat up on the other thread and the same thing will happen again.

I didn't get beat up anywhere at all. I don't know what you're talking about.

5 posted on 01/03/2007 8:59:24 AM PST by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Yeah right! Catch you later it's time for Rush.


6 posted on 01/03/2007 9:00:19 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

I wonder if people remember that Reagan was divorced/remarried?
Don't see any grief about that lil nugget on FR...


7 posted on 01/03/2007 9:00:22 AM PST by fhlh (Liberal (noun): A person so open minded, their brains have fallen out of their head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhlh
I wonder if people remember that Reagan was divorced/remarried?

How can I forget? Liberals bring it up all the time when they want to talk about "'family values'" (They add the quotes, and I'm quoting them.) Reagan, Rudy, Newt, etc. And then, somehow, magically, Bill Clinton is an honorable family man. (It is to gag.)

TS

8 posted on 01/03/2007 9:03:58 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fhlh
It has become quite a fun game to watch and keep track of anonymous "freepers", on this forum, smear and defeat every Republican and Conservative in office, running, and thinking about running.

We should do the same on their liberal forums, lol.
9 posted on 01/03/2007 9:05:33 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fhlh
I wonder if people remember that Reagan was divorced/remarried? Don't see any grief about that lil nugget on FR...

Why? Reagan did not get divorced by his choice. Thanks to the strain communist harrassment put on his first marriage, his first wife ran off with her costar in a movie. She filed for divorce, not him.

10 posted on 01/03/2007 9:10:53 AM PST by ExpandNATO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

There was nothing at all damning about the document. A lot of fluff about nothing. I do hope they catch the turncoat GOPer, though. I'm thinking it's from either the Romney or McCain campaign since they are the ones who would benefit by knocking Rudy out early.


11 posted on 01/03/2007 9:13:08 AM PST by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
We should do the same on their liberal forums, lol.

We can't. Most liberal forums will boot anyone who does not drink the Kool-Aid and toe the lib party line. Probably because they are afraid of actually debating ideas.

Here, any libscum can post, too. Again, most are afraid of a true debate of ideas, so they pretend to be consevatives, but they're usually pretty transparent. They don't get booted. Instead, their inane feeling-based cognitively dissonant "positions" just get shredded, which I think is far more effective.

BTW, I still hadn't really made up my mind about Rudy. Don't think I'll have to -- this mess is probably going to take him out of serious contention for the nomination. What a screw-up...

12 posted on 01/03/2007 9:13:35 AM PST by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

"the real blame belongs to the former mayor"



Someone steals from you and it's your fault? Sounds like something a liberal rag would say, though.


13 posted on 01/03/2007 9:14:31 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Rudy a conservative? When?


14 posted on 01/03/2007 9:16:23 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (BUAIDH NO BAS, JUST SAY NO TO RINO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fhlh
I wonder if people remember that Reagan was divorced/remarried? Don't see any grief about that lil nugget on FR...

Rudy is a serial adulterer. Married his second cousin. Shacked up with his mistress in Gracie Mansion - the Mayor's official residence. Etcetera. Etcetera. There's no valid comparison. Besides - the primary is not between liberal Rudy and Ronald Reagan.

It's ridiculous how people bring up conservative Ronald Reagan's imperfections to defend liberal Giuliani's offensive behavior. Sounds just like the Dems defending Clinton oval office activities.

Liberal Giuliani's own campaign admits, in the lost documents, that Rudy's wandering weenie is a "problem" that must be overcome to get him elected. That may cause him to take the big donors' money but then withdraw from the race. Are you carrying the liberals' water for them now? Is there anything that could be uncovered about liberal Rudy's sordid history that would disqualify him, in your eyes, from being a candidate that conservatives should vote for? Are there any views and positions that he could hold (aside from his support for the radical gay agends, being pro-partial birth abortion, being a gun grabber, being a liberal on just about every issue under the sun) that would disqualify him?

15 posted on 01/03/2007 9:17:01 AM PST by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: inkling
I'm thinking it's from either the Romney or McCain campaign since they are the ones who would benefit by knocking Rudy out early.

We (conservatives) would ALL benefit by knocking Rudy out early.

16 posted on 01/03/2007 9:18:17 AM PST by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: piytar
If it wasn't this, it would be something else, as with all of our candidates.

FR's freepers will dump them at the slightest hint of "bad press".

No need to wonder why we have so very few Conservative candidates when they know their base is weak at heart.
17 posted on 01/03/2007 9:19:43 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

I take it you don't like Giuliani.

The NY Daily News is a wholly owned subsidiary of bill & hillary clinton. They fear Giuliani as a candidate and are desperately using innuendo to try to make him look bad.

But where's the beef?

It's his fault that airport workers stole something out of his baggage? Maybe it was careless, but that doesn't excuse Democrat operators from stealing it, or the Daily News from desperately trying to make propaganda out of stolen goods.

Exactly what was so damaging about these secret plans? I read yesterday's report as well as this one, and other than being annoying to have your fund raising plans known by the enemy, I fail to see anything damaging about it.

Big deal. Giuliani is raising money for a presidential campaign. What a surprise.


18 posted on 01/03/2007 9:19:45 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhlh
"I wonder if people remember that Reagan was divorced/remarried?
Don't see any grief about that lil nugget on FR..."

Not only was Reagan divorced and remarried. But, Old Hickory had quite a scandal in his campaign. The opposition talked abut putting a "a whore and an adulterer in the white house." also Grover Cleveland had his own." I think people will judge the candidates on there own merits. While, the Rudy marital history is a liability there is much to be commended in Rudy.
19 posted on 01/03/2007 9:19:54 AM PST by bilhosty (to hell with ABCNNBCBS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Reminds me of - George F. Will: Briefing Book Baloney
20 posted on 01/03/2007 9:20:33 AM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson