PING!
Posted on 01/02/2007 8:36:13 PM PST by GMMAC
Ding dong, the tyrant's dead
Barbara Kay, National Post
Published: Tuesday, January 02, 2007
Funny things, these executions of murderous tyrants. They really separate the liberal elites from the ordinary people like nothing else I know. Take Saddam Hussein's execution the other day. When I, an ordinary person, heard Saddam had been executed, I did a little on-the-spot jig and started humming Ding Dong, the Witch is Dead.
But most po-faced Western public figures (while doing a jig in their hearts) were jostling each other in the race to be first in line to condemn capital punishment. Of course they were glad the odious Saddam Hussein was no longer amongst us, but that didn't mean they could possibly condone the only means possible to facilitate that desirable outcome.
Official statements by Western countries were Kofi Annan-esque in their hypocritical smarminess. An advisory of the French Foreign Ministry noted that "[France] calls, like all of its European partners, for the universal abolition of the death penalty." U.K. foreign secretary Margaret Beckett said: "We advocate an end to the death penalty worldwide, regardless of the individual or the crime" (my emphasis).
Now, ordinary people resent that categorical refusal to categorize: They see a meaningful difference between, say, the biker gang thug who knows he's a social outlaw when he bumps off a few turf rivals, and a tyrant who satisfies his ghoulish hunger for blood by ordering up daily murders of his own people like a side of fries at McDonald's. I guess that makes us ordinaries a good example of -- what's that French word again? -- oh yes, simplisme.
Canada issued a dignified, neutral statement: "Canada joins other nations in supporting the desire of Iraq's leaders and citizens for a peaceful and prosperous future." But bless George W. Bush for unhesitatingly going the extra mile and speaking the whole truth. He was, of course, the only Western leader to use the dreaded "J" word: "Bringing Saddam Hussein to justice ? is an important milestone on Iraq's course to becoming a democracy."
In the days when our culture was confident of its collective identity and values, we shared a consensus that it was society's obligation -- distasteful as it might be in the event -- to uphold the principle of justice. Except for the U.S. -- where this religion-derived spirit still thrives with stubborn strength -- the West's benchmark for the proper moral response to threats to the social order has become subjective feeling, which recoils from action, rather than allegiance to principles, which demands it.
Instead of asking what might be an appropriate, objective public gesture to address the outrageousness of the crimes themselves, we are taught to ask instead: Could I personally hang Saddam? Oh no, I would feel "cruel and barbaric," the most commonly applied trope to the death penalty. Nobody wants personally to seem cruel. But then we have to justify our failure to mete out justice by giving paralysis of will a moral gloss. So we cheat and take a shortcut. We simply agree that while bad people like the Taliban and Saddam shouldn't do what they do, all killing by the state is equally wrong and equally immoral, and that retribution in kind is always "sinking to their level." This makes no sense, of course: If all killing by the state were immoral, no wars would be "just" and our soldiers would be criminals unless they waited to be shot at before killing declared enemies.
Sensitivity and compassion rather than dutifulness and stoicism are now the great virtues, and so the measures they cause us to shrink from are judged immoral. It's no longer about how bad the evildoer is, it's about how good we are. This shift in focus from the evildoer's deeds to the compassion of his "judges" serves the additional purpose, much desired by liberals, of making today's Westerners feel superior to our (self-righteous, God-fearing, colonialist, racist, sexist) forebears.
Unfortunately the feelings-based adoption of mercy alone as a default response to evil by our legislators and public intellectuals makes a travesty of the idea of justice. Not at all the healthy sign it is spun as, rather it's a symptom of our elites' loss of confidence and our culture's loss of self-respect.
As for most Americans and a good many ordinary Canadians, who are still "simplistic" enough to recognize justice when they see it, they do not grieve that Saddam's "gone where the goblins go, beLOW, below below beLOW below below be-LOW below below ? "
Bkay@videotron.ca
© National Post 2007
PING!
Great article. And I agree: this clamor for moral relativism drives me crazy. Evil is evil, and normal people can recognize it and applaud its destruction with no problem at all.
Bravo. Thanks for posting this.
No. I don't know how to tie all the knots, or where the lever to the thingie is that makes the trapdoor open.
But I coulda shot him!
It sure beat the usual first class ticket into a luxurious exile.
They could have had eyewitness interviews of Saddams' murders for years and barely touched the surface of all the people he butchered. They found over 300,000 dead in mass graves. In a just world, they should have thrown the bastard in one of those gigantic plastic shredders he used, filled it with pig blood, and held a public lottery on who got to turn the machine on. Put in on public TV.
The Libs are against Saddam's execution becuse they fear full discolure of their actual agenda.
Watched a program on Saddam on the History Channel tonight. Somebody should have killed that trash 30 years ago. he was waaaaaaay over due.
Where were the bleeding hearts when Saddam was torturing and killing his people?
Bump for morning reading.
Lieberals are hypocrites.
My Mom was telling me about that show being on tonight. She said she was going to tape it. Something about Hitler & Saddam - Butt-buddies - a Dark Secret Revealed?
I was kind of curious concerning the sort of revisionist history that program contained.
I could do it - but I would have pushed for piano wire instead of rope - and for lowering him gently, so as to make the experience more memorable for him.
If they ever get the chance to put the job of hanging Bin-Laden up for bidding, I suspect the line of Americans wanting the job would extend across several state boundaries.
I watched the same program. Did you catch that bit right near the end where Juan Cole asserted that U.N. inspectors found and destroyed ALL!!! of Hussein's bio and chem wmds right after the first gulf war? Yes, that's right all of them. What a laugh. How in the world does he know that? Then why did Hussein kick the inspectors out in 1998? A good program ruined by a bunch of horse-twaddle from some leftist.
It was mostly a good program, but was ruined by the unintentional or intentional anti-Bush admin commentary by leftist professor Juan Cole near the end. He claimed that U.N. inspectors had found and destroyed all of Hussein's chem and bio wmds right after the first gulf war. Victor Davis Hanson also provided commentary in the program, but there was no rebuttal to Cole's factless assertion.
Thanks for the ping, great artical.
Other than that I thought the program was informative.
In the program it was clearly stated that Saddam killed persons personally and was responsible for thousands of deaths. It also stated he would go down in the annals of history as a murderous POS equal to Hitler and Stalin.
The trial he was given only used a portion of these killed people to get him hanged, I can understand the angst of the family's of people who werent brought up in the trial at their relatives not being recognised, but it doesnt change the fact that this monster now lies in a hole rotting.
They were worrying about IMPORTANT things, like why women can't join the club that hosts the Masters' Golf Tournament.
I hope a lot of people watched that program. Apparently there are plenty of people who believe that Hussein NEVER!! had any chem or bio wmds. That program should have opened their eyes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.