Posted on 01/02/2007 6:56:58 PM PST by faq
Former CNN head Eason Jordan calls out the Associated Press: The AP’s Jamil Hussein Scandal.
If an Iraqi police captain by the name of Jamil Hussein exists, there is no convincing evidence of it - and that means the Associated Press has a journalistic scandal on its hands that will fester until the AP deals with it properly.
This controversy and the AP’s handling of it call into question the credibility, integrity, and smarts of one of the world’s biggest, most influential, most respected news organizations, the New York-based Associated Press.
The back story: On November 24, the AP quoted Iraqi Police Captain Jamil Hussein as the source of a sensational AP story that began this way:
“Militiamen grabbed six Sunnis as they left Friday worship services, doused them with kerosene and burned them alive as Iraqi soldiers stood by.”
It was a horrific report that was an AP exclusive - a story picked up and reported by news outlets across the U.S. and the world.
The U.S. military and Iraqi officials were quick to call the story baseless, saying there was no evidence that six Sunnis were burned to death in Hurriya and that there was no record of an Iraqi police captain named Jamil Hussein. The U.S. military and the Iraqi government demanded the AP retract the story and explain itself.
The AP fired back with at least three strong statements defending the initial AP report and provided a follow-up report from Baghdad quoting anonymous witnesses as confirming the original immolation story.
In the absence of irrefutable evidence that Captain Hussein exists and that the original AP report was accurate, bloggers and a few mainstream media journalists kept plugging away in an effort to get to the truth about whether there is a Captain Hussein and whether six Sunnis were burned alive that day.
Five weeks after the disputed episode, key questions remain unanswered, but what is clear is the AP has botched its handling of this controversy - and it’s not going away until the AP deals with it forthrightly and transparently.
IraqSlogger’s probe into the case is inconclusive, with conflicting and unconfirmed information regarding whether there’s a Captain Hussein and whether the reported immolation happened. Inquiries by others point to there being no Captain Jamil Hussein, although there is no proof of that.
While proof might yet surface to substantiate the AP’s story - there is circumstantial but unreliable evidence in that regard - conclusive evidence has not yet materialized.
The AP has steadfastly refused to answer questions about this episode from IraqSlogger and other news outlets and bloggers.
In statements, the AP insists Captain Hussein is real, insists he has been known to the AP and others for years, and insists the immolation episode occurred based on multiple eyewitnesses.
But efforts by two governments, several news organizations, and bloggers have failed to produce such evidence or proof that there is a Captain Jamil Hussein. The AP cannot or will not produce him or convincing evidence of his existence.
Also see Confederate Yankee for an in-depth examination of the more than 60 reports attributed to Jamil Hussein—reports that are almost completely uncorroborated by other sources.
UPDATE at 1/2/07 5:11:59 pm:
The Associated Press continues stonewalling. (Hat tip: Allahpundit.)
Kathleen Carroll, AP executive editor, told E&P today that she had not read Jordan’s latest item, posted Monday, and likely would not. But she stood by the news organization’s previous statements backing the existence of an Iraqi police captain, Jamail Hussein.
“I’ve been pretty public about what we have done to get to the crux of the criticism we have gotten about it,” she added. When asked about critics’ demands that AP produce Hussein to prove his existence, she said “that area [where he works] has pretty much been ethnically cleansed, it is a nasty place and continues to be.”
Carroll said that Hussein “is a guy we’ve talked to for years,” adding that “we don’t have anything new to say about it, nothing new to add.”
That sign is very appropriate as this is the first time I have seen someone who lacks credibility and manufactures news accusing someone else of stealing their technique.
Eason Jordan is a slimeball for being Saddam's puppet for all those years in the name of making a buck...BUT...he is right here.
Al-AP...aka NY TIMES has once again engaged in yellow journalism and has been caught red handed.
That rag isn't fit to line a bird cage or wrap fish.
Right. And since there is no proof Bigfoot isn't roaming the forests of Oregon, we have to believe in the possibility. /sarc
If there is such a person then there should be no problem producing him. More media lies.
It does not matter whether there is a Jamil Hussein or not because his information is accurate regardless. </ DanRather>
Am I reading this correctly? Eason is criticizing AP for inaccurate reporting? ROFLMAO!!!
or sourcing him for more of the sensational stories that are such good propaganda.
It may be a nasty place, but it's 60 stories less nasty than what AP describes.
I'm 9 posts into the FReeper commentary, and I'm still trying to wrap my brain around it.
This story and thread really isn't about Eason Jordan.
I understand your point, but you surely understand the surprise and shock among many of us that Mr. Jordan would have the temerity to take on the AP. That is a big story in-and-of-itself.
CNN (ex) fighting AP.
Gotta love it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.