Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jews, Muslims, and the Democrats
Commentary ^ | January 2007 | Gabriel Schoenfeld

Posted on 01/01/2007 5:56:33 AM PST by gallaxyglue

Jews, Muslims, and the Democrats Gabriel Schoenfeld January 2007 The 2006 midterm elections confirmed once again a truism of American politics: American Jews remain overwhelmingly devoted to the Democratic party. According to exit polling, the tilt this year was, if anything, even more pronounced than it has been in the past. Some 88 percent of Jewish votes went to Democratic candidates, while a mere 12 percent went to the GOP.

Along with this lopsided outcome, a historical extreme, comes the news that the number of Jewish representatives in Congress has itself reached an all-time high. Although Jews represent a marginal sliver—a mere 2 percent—of the U.S. population, they now hold 13 seats in the U.S. Senate, all but two of them—Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Norm Coleman of Minnesota—Democratic. (Bernard Sanders of Vermont, elected as an independent, has pledged to vote with the Democratic caucus.) In the House of Representatives, Jews, all but one of them Democrats, now occupy 30 seats.

Party affiliation aside, this surely denotes a high-water mark of Jewish political representation, just as Joseph Lieberman’s presence on Al Gore’s presidential ticket set a previous mark in 2000. But party affiliation cannot be placed to one side. For the paradoxical and disturbing fact is that even as Jewish voters remain unwaveringly loyal to the Democrats, and even as Jewish representation in national office, almost entirely Democratic in color, has risen to an all-time high, the Democratic party itself is becoming demonstrably less hospitable to Jewish interests. Indeed, on at least one matter of central concern—the safety and security of the state of Israel—the party and the American Jewish community may be heading toward a slow-motion collision.

This development is not exactly of recent vintage—its historical roots can be traced as far back as the late 1960’s—but it has taken on an increasingly stark aspect as the party has progressively succumbed to the influence of its own left wing and to blind hatred of George W. Bush. And recently a new element has entered as well, symbolized by the election this past November of Keith Ellison, the first-ever Muslim member of the House of Representatives, on Minnesota’s Democratic Farmer-Labor (DFL) ticket. Ellison’s story is unique, but also a symptom of larger trends.

“Louis Farrakhan’s First Congressman” is how the Weekly Standard titled an election-eve profile of Ellison. In the late 1980’s, while still a law student, Ellison had indeed been an activist in the Nation of Islam, Farrakhan’s black-Muslim cult. Writing under the pseudonyms of Keith Hakim, Keith X. Ellison, and Keith Ellison Muhammad, he called for the establishment of an independent black republic in the American South and defended the unadorned anti-Semitic pronouncements of Farrakhan and his organization. Long after completing law school, moreover, Ellison continued to work with the Nation of Islam, joining with more prominent black leaders, including the Reverend Jesse Jackson and the Reverend Al Sharpton, to help organize the 1995 Million Man March.

Ellison was carrying other baggage as well. Critics, particularly his Republican opponent, were quick to raise questions about his ties to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an organization that has been linked to radical Islamists and anti-Semites of various stripes.

But attempts to derail his candidacy on these grounds failed. Under fire during the campaign for his associations with the Nation of Islam, Ellison wrote a letter to the Minnesota Jewish community-relations council in which he admitted that as a young man he “did not adequately scrutinize the positions and statements” of the Nation of Islam, acknowledged that they “were and are anti-Semitic,” and declared that “I should have come to that conclusion earlier than I did.” On the strength of this and similar statements he proceeded to win endorsements from the American Jewish World, a “progressive” local paper, and the even more “progressive” Minneapolis Star Tribune, the latter of which dismissed criticism of his links to CAIR as “a smear campaign.1”

Both the ease with which Ellison was able to glide through this controversy and the remarkable lack of discomfort his candidacy appeared to cause among his fellow Democrats point to the larger significance of his election. For the simple fact is that in certain respects he is not alone: the past decade or so has seen the formation of a group of 40 to 50 Democratic Congressmen who, in varying degrees of intensity, have felt free to express an uninhibited hostility toward the Jewish state.

A coarse index of this group’s membership was on display last May when Hamas, the Islamic fundamentalist terror organization pledged to Israel’s destruction, won elections in Gaza and the West Bank and assumed control of the Palestinian Authority. In response, Congress took up the Palestinian Anti-Terror Act of 2006—legislation aimed at denying U.S. financial aid to the Palestinian Authority unless and until the President could certify that terror groups were not among its recipients, that the new Palestinian regime recognized Israel’s right to exist, and that it remained committed to agreements with Israel signed by its predecessors. The bill passed the Senate unanimously. In the House, a similar but slightly tougher version also passed handily—but not without drawing 37 nay votes and 9 votes of “present” only. Of the 46 representatives either actively opposing the bill or unwilling to vote for it, 41 were Democrats.

To be fair, not every Congressman who failed to support the legislation could automatically be counted as unsympathetic to Israel; the State Department had expressed its own reservations about the House version on the grounds that it unduly limited American flexibility. Still, the number of Democrats ready to oppose so straightforward an anti-terror measure was striking, and all the more so in light of the Democrats’ long record as the party friendlier to Israel than the Republicans.

What explains this turnabout? A full answer would take us on a sojourn through the twists and turns not only of party politics but of the ideological, cultural, and racial disputes of the past decades as they have affected both domestic and foreign policy. But of particular relevance in the present context is the demographic ingredient exemplified by Keith Ellison.

The Muslim population of the United States has been steadily growing. Although the numbers are hotly disputed—the U.S. census does not gather information about religious affiliation—a middle-range estimate tells us there are four to six million Muslims in the country. Not in dispute is that they are one of the fastest growing segments of the U.S. population, and that with increasing size has come increasing potency within American political life.

Where populations are sufficiently concentrated in America, so too, usually, is political clout. As a rule America’s Muslims have settled in major cities—Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, and New York—where they are still too sparsely present to exercise significant weight as a bloc. Smaller localities, however, tell a different story. Thus, in Minneapolis-St. Paul, where many émigrés from strife-torn Somalia happen to have gathered, Muslims formed an important building block of Keith Ellison’s electoral victory. In places like Dearborn and Detroit, Michigan, where many immigrants from the Arab world have settled, Muslims enjoy a far larger degree of political influence.


TOPICS: Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; blackmuslims; democrats; goldencalf; islam; israel; keithellison; noi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: westmichman

I work in internet marketing. A huge amount of work by Search
Engine Optimization types is devoted to becoming a "trusted source".
Once you become a trusted source for something you can sell just about anything related to it.

Commentary is not a "trusted source" for liberal jews in the way that NBC,CBS,ABC, NYTimes, Hollywood--are trusted sources.


41 posted on 01/01/2007 11:22:16 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

These "untrusted sources" in Commentary are often policy insiders for the U.S Government. The government trusts them but their Jewish colleagues do not. Go figure.


42 posted on 01/01/2007 11:29:34 AM PST by westmichman (The will of God always trumps the will of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: repvetsyiydli

That was pretty cold.


43 posted on 01/01/2007 11:31:54 AM PST by westmichman (The will of God always trumps the will of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

The simple way to say what I said above -- would be: "for reasons of their own -- liberal jews don't like republicans."


44 posted on 01/01/2007 11:48:33 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Agree. Also, the 88% is an exit poll used by the Democrats but not deemed reliable according to the Republican Jewish Coalition which represents over 25,000 dedicated conservatives. Its figure is 76%.


45 posted on 01/01/2007 11:49:39 AM PST by masadaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

When a majority of Jews in that Minnesota congressional district vote for Keith Ellison, a Muslim, instead of the other candidate, who is a Jew, that is just a bit much to take. There is no hope for people who are that stupid.


46 posted on 01/01/2007 11:56:15 AM PST by Past Your Eyes (Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

Amen


47 posted on 01/01/2007 12:39:47 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

48 posted on 01/01/2007 2:17:13 PM PST by SJackson (had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The way most American Jews act in these times offers me an explanation for how the German Jews acted in the 1930s (and no, I am NOT saying that the times are analogous), that is, against their own interests.

A large majority of German Jews acted in their best interests, they left Germany. Unfortunately some could find no where to go, and many were able only to flee to countries like France and Poland, which later fell.

49 posted on 01/01/2007 2:21:56 PM PST by SJackson (had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
The largest enclave of Jewish voters in Minnesota's 5th Congressional district is in the first ring suburb of St. Louis Park. Here's a link the the MN Secretary of State website: http://electionresults.sos.state.mn.us/20061107/PrecRptByCounty.asp?rq=27HENNEPIN&M=CTY&CtyCd=27&CtyNm=HENNEPIN Scroll down on this page to the St. Louis Park precincts. That will give you the clearest view of SLP voting patterns and will show you that they (ethnic Jews) were voting in droves for ethnic suicide. There is a large community of Orthodox Jews living here, but I'm not sure which precinct they're in. They might have voted different from the more secular and liberal faith Jews - at least I hope so.

Doesn't matter how they voted. Over 600,000 people live in the 5th district. There are only 40,000 or so Jews in the entire state. No way they could overcome the support for Ellison. A lousy 4,000 or so Muslims. Face it, if there's a religious connection to Ellison's election, which I doubt, it's the Christians.

50 posted on 01/01/2007 2:27:53 PM PST by SJackson (had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes
I look at all this and wonder (sometimes) "Why bother?". They seem bent on their own destruction and if anyone gets in their way or speaks truth to them, he is an "anti-Semite". Why should I care and try to help them if they won't even help themselves?

You shouldn't. I hope you feel the same way about those Lutheran lutefiskers that elected him.

51 posted on 01/01/2007 2:29:43 PM PST by SJackson (had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

A large majority of German Jews acted in their best interests, they left Germany. Unfortunately some could find no where to go, and many were able only to flee to countries like France and Poland, which later fell.
///////////////
There is the famous story During WWII of the ship full of jewish refugees that came near the USA-- but was returned to Europe and its fate.

However, this was during FDR's democratic administration. So why don't the democrats get unending grief for this injustice.


52 posted on 01/01/2007 2:39:39 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: gallaxyglue

I never smoke dope and post on Free Republic.


53 posted on 01/01/2007 2:43:27 PM PST by JamminJAY (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
There is the famous story During WWII of the ship full of jewish refugees that came near the USA-- but was returned to Europe and its fate. However, this was during FDR's democratic administration. So why don't the democrats get unending grief for this injustice.

Because the story was the same everywhere, and across parties in the US. It's not like the Republicans (or anyone else) cared.

54 posted on 01/01/2007 2:53:55 PM PST by SJackson (had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Because the story was the same everywhere, and across parties in the US. It's not like the Republicans (or anyone else) cared.
///////////////
Maybe, but democratic dominance in government during that period was pretty overwhelming. Of course it should be said for the democrats that they are mostly crosses at the military cemetary at Normandy.


55 posted on 01/01/2007 3:03:56 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Many did leave, but many did not since they thought "this couldn't be happening to ME." That is why--even in the face of continuing rumors about the dreadful fate that awaited them--they stayed within the "system." Too many packed cattle cars and too few Warsaw Ghetto Uprisings.


56 posted on 01/01/2007 3:31:41 PM PST by Pharmboy ([She turned me into a] Newt! in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Many did leave, but many did not since they thought "this couldn't be happening to ME."

That's possible, but about 70% left, and plenty couldn't find a place to "leave" to. Personally, I've seen nothing to make me believe denial was a factor. And no, those who stayed didn't forsee that extermination was their ultimate fate. Germany was, after all, a civilized European nation.

57 posted on 01/01/2007 4:19:52 PM PST by SJackson (had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: westmichman
I'm Jewish and just about every Jew I know is self sufficient and would never go on welfare.

Hell when my dad took off on us, my mom was left with 3 small kids, no education and no skills.

But she took any work rather than going on welfare and eventually became a nurse.

And when our apartment burnt down we kids forced our mom to go get $600 from the Red Cross. She paid them back every red cent. Who the hell pays the Red Cross back??? Not those from Katrina I'm sure.

But how did she vote all her life, democrat.

Hell me being a Jew I don't get it either.
58 posted on 01/01/2007 5:01:43 PM PST by repvetsyiydli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
You're correct in that Ellison would've been elected no matter what. I agree completely and said numerous times on this board that he'd be elected no matter what - the RATs in my district (Ellison's 5th) are nuts.

To say, however, that the Christians elected him is pretty far removed from the truth. If you mean that were all, by default, Christians because we live in a so-called Christian nation, well, I guess I can grudgingly give you that. It is wrong, though, because most people who identify themselves as Christian and especially those of traditional Christian beliefs don't vote that way at all.

In addition, what I was interested in was the voting behavior of Jews in the 5th. Outside of Highland Park in St. Paul, St. Louis Park has more Jews that any other POU I can think of. I don't assert Ellison won by the Jewish vote, but I was curious as to how Jews voted. I would wager (after looking at the breakdown) that a fair portion of them voted for Tammy Lee because of Ellison's stink. However, I would also bet many of them voted for him simply because many of them are brain dead voters like so many other Minnesotans. Terminal stupidity is blind to race, ethnicity and color and in the end it even ignores survival.
59 posted on 01/01/2007 5:56:41 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Here is one source for my statement. I would recommend this amazing book. And, I disagree with nothing you wrote.


60 posted on 01/01/2007 6:17:47 PM PST by Pharmboy ([She turned me into a] Newt! in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson