You know that isn't acceptable reporting. Until you have spoken to the person who made the decision to use (sic) or made an attempt to do so and were rebuffed, you are being as subjective as you claim ABC to be.
Please answer the question I posted earlier: what is the possible error or confusion in the comment in the screen graphic that would possibly have required a 'sic'?
What makes it then ,"not acceptable reporting"?
Governs never ever claimed to be objective in my years of reading his posts. Why establish a straw man argument if you feel strong about your own position?