[lqclamar]

The world of citations according to Zimmy. Here's what his claimed citation stated:

"Raffael Scheck in his article on African POWs in the Second World War, in the Journal of Modern History, July 2005"

Notice there is no actual title of the article itself, no volume number of the journal, and no page numbers. Also note that he finally produced this source after weeks of evasion and quoting from Marxist reparationist websites like Africultures.com. It's both odd and hypocritical that he now demands I meet citation standards that he himself refuses to abide by.

But of course this is all just a diversion away from the historical fact of 57,000+ Muslim nazi troops. It stems from no genuine desire to verify those numbers or check the pages they appear on (the sources WITH TITLES - something Zimmy does not consider himself obliged to provide - have already been made available). Rather, it's simply an attempt to obfuscate the fact of 57,000+ muslim nazis. If I went back and looked up all the page numbers he'd simply find something else to complain about. Hell, I could scan and PDF the book for him and post a highlighted copy online and he'd still find an excuse not to accept it. All of that leaves me asking why I should even bother wasting my time for him. And the answer is I won't.

[zimdog]

Clammy, how hard was it to find the article when I gave you the author, journal, and date? If it wasn't sufficient, how did you find it? The Journal of Modern History does not publish several volumes each month, and Rafael Scheck does not write several articles on African POWs in the Second World War in each of these alleged volumes. You're a real piece of work.

But of course this is all just a diversion away from the historical fact of 57,000+ Muslim nazi troops.

If it's a historical fact, prove it. Provide the page numbers.

the sources WITH TITLES - something Zimmy does not consider himself obliged to provide - have already been made available

"Anybody can throw out a book title or author. If you can't show specifically what they say and represent it accurately you shouldn't expect others to take your word on it."

And the answer is I won't.

You can claim whatever reason you want for your refusal to provide more accurate citations upon request. But the fact is that you are deliberately obstructing access to the proof you claim exists.