To: Quix
If so, for me, too.
I don't judge his Christianity. That is for God alone. I do judge his works, including his writings, such as I know them. Which isn't that much as he does not interest me, particularly.
I only scanned "The Purpose, etc", but it seemed actually pretty New Agey to me at the time. Sorry, I don't remember specifics now. But the Obama thing just confirms me in my opinion that I was right.
But certainly, I could be wrong, and certainly, you are both entitled to, and presumably competent to, form your own opinions. As I said, I could be wrong.
202 posted on
12/31/2006 3:51:55 PM PST by
chesley
("Socialism" - compassion for those that don't have any.)
To: chesley
I'm not the world's expert on RW either.
But I'm at least as up on him in some respects as his accusers.
And, oddly, such accusers mostly come from denominational perspectives which seem to emphasize GRACE.
Could have fooled me.
204 posted on
12/31/2006 3:54:23 PM PST by
Quix
(LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson