Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phsstpok
Here's the transcript of Late Edition and Lieberman/Specter on the why/why not to visit Damascus....

LIEBERMAN: I did. With all respect to Arlen, I want to explain why I made the decision not to go to Damascus. Look, there's a general principle of, I don't think America should hesitate to think about talking to anybody. But when we talk about people who are hostile to us, who have blood on their hands like the Syrians, we have to talk to them at a time when it can benefit us, not them.

When we're in a position of strength, not to try to strengthen them. The fact is, there's ever reason to believe that Bashar Assad has started this kind of communications offensive to distract the world from holding his regime accountable for the assassination of the Lebanese leader Hariri, and more recently, of the Christian Lebanese leader Gemayel.

This regime of his in Syria has allowed al Qaida foreign fighters to go across Syria and into Iraq, where they have killed American soldiers. So I don't think that -- I think, in fact, we serve his purposes when we talk to him.

And in this case, I believe the Bush administration and Secretary Rice have it right. And when some of us in the Senate go to see Assad in Damascus, contrary to the position the administration has taken, it sends a mixed signal, and it weakens our position. And I think it leads him to achieve a public relations victory that he doesn't deserve.

BLITZER: I want to move on, but I want you to, I want you to...

SPECTER: May I give a response?

BLITZER: Senator Specter, I want you to respond. And then we'll move on.

SPECTER: OK. Well, the Congress, senators, have a very deep responsibility on foreign policy. I serve on the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee and foreign operations, chaired the Intelligence Committee. We vote for $8 billion a month for Iraq and Afghanistan, $500 billion a year for the military and homeland defense, and constitutionally we have a responsibility.

And senators are independent. Under our constitution, there is a separation of power. And it is true that the president has primary responsibility for foreign policy, but not exclusive responsibility.

And I respect what the administration is doing, but there are others of us who have been in the region who have studied it intently and have some useful suggestions to make. And I think that independence is the strength of our system, and I intend to exercise it.

BLITZER: I'll give you one more chance to respond, and then we'll move on.

LIEBERMAN: Well, of course, senators have a right to go. I just think it was the wrong time to go to Damascus because it encourages Assad and allows him to distract from the terrible things he's done, like killing the Lebanese leaders and letting al Qaida go through his country into Iraq where they kill American soldiers. He doesn't deserve a meeting now.

347 posted on 12/31/2006 11:30:42 AM PST by Chuck54 (later..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]


To: Chuck54

Lieberman gets it, Specter does not. I was appalled at the Senators from both sides of the aisle considering a Syria-Iran-US Senate Senate summit..


354 posted on 12/31/2006 11:34:37 AM PST by cardinal4 (Ding Dong the Witch is Dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

To: Chuck54
I watched Late Edition with those two... my take on the conversation is Lieberman is more in step with most of us on the WOT AND Foreign Relations than Specter. I was proud to hear Liberman explain why he refuses to go to Syria and meet with Asad and then there was Specter saying we have separation of powers and the Senate has every right to run their own trips to visit other leaders in other countries and the State Department has nothing to say about it....

I was sick listening to this man, our President campaigned to re-elect, talk like a libeal Democrat.

356 posted on 12/31/2006 11:35:54 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

To: Chuck54
BLITZER: I want to move on....

I'll just bet he wanted to move on after Lieberman started talking sense.

367 posted on 12/31/2006 11:45:33 AM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

To: Chuck54
#347, that was a priceless interview. Specter is more senile than Nelson. Hooray for Joltin Joe.
443 posted on 12/31/2006 1:32:28 PM PST by samantha (The New Media fighting the DBM for our Sanity, Survival ,Soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson