Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wave farewell to AM radio, say experts
Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | 12/30/06 | David Sapsted

Posted on 12/30/2006 9:02:48 AM PST by kiriath_jearim

Radio broadcasts on medium wave will end within a few years if a powerful coalition of commercial radio interests has its way.

Ofcom, commercial radio's regulatory body, will launch a debate in the coming months on the future of radio.

Many predict that it will result in the end of AM broadcasts as we have known them since the days of the Home Service and Light Programme.

The growth of digital broadcasts, either on radio, over the internet or through digital television, has left commercial AM broadcasts with only 3.8 per cent of the national audience this year.

While the BBC remains on the sidelines — the vast bulk of its weekly Radio Five Live audience of 5.7 million still listens on AM — leading figures in the commercial sector are determined to sound the death knell of medium wave.

The commercial stations are having to face up to the dwindling numbers tuning in to AM stations as people opt for FM broadcasts or, increasingly, the higher quality of digital broadcasts.

"The current AM licences are up for renewal in 2011 and 2012," an Ofcom spokesman said yesterday. "The question we have to address is whether or not these stations will be commercially viable by then."

Fru Hazlitt, the chief executive of Virgin Radio, is an outspoken critic of AM.

"We pay huge amounts of money to Ofcom for the AM licence," she said. "Within the next year or two we should switch it off. It just isn't worth it."

Andy Duncan, the chief executive of Channel 4, predicted that, over the next five to 10 years, AM and FM listening would wither away.

Capital Radio bosses have also been calling on the Government to set a date to switch off both AM and FM.

Not everyone agrees, however, that AM is a dead duck. Emap, whose Magic AM has been relaunched nationwide, believes there is still a place for medium wave.

Ofcom said it hoped to begin a wide consultation over the future of AM.

"There could be much more effective uses for this spectrum — it could be used for community radio," the spokesman said. "The growth of digital at the cost of analogue cannot be ignored."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Technical
KEYWORDS: amradio; radio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2006 9:02:49 AM PST by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
Hmmm, AM seems to do well here in the US covering small local areas.

Talk radio, local Christian and Spanish stations to name a few.

Local High School football/basketball games are also on AM.

Brits that different?
2 posted on 12/30/2006 9:06:29 AM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Scheduled for Extinction List:
AM Radio.
NPR
Newspapers.
CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC.
DU


3 posted on 12/30/2006 9:09:21 AM PST by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody want a peanut.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

Yep, Old Europe is that different. In the US Rush Limbaugh will keep the AM broadcast alive in spite of Air America. Hahaha.


4 posted on 12/30/2006 9:09:35 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Seems unlikely unless the FCC gets greedy or Pelosi and McCain finish off free speech.


5 posted on 12/30/2006 9:17:03 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Saddam is Dead! Bush's Fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Yep, Old Europe is that different. In the US Rush Limbaugh will keep the AM broadcast alive in spite of Air America. Hahaha.

I agree with you. But the MSM and the dems in power will see the demise of Err Amerika as the demise of AM here and will want to auction the band width for digital communications for garage door openers. Rush's success, amongst others, will be seen as an abberation and will ignore it for the trend facing liberal and MSM radio. If they can't ressurect the fairness doctrine, the looney left will say it is deteriorating market conditions just to shut down talk radio.

6 posted on 12/30/2006 9:18:58 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
A few years back there was talk of "Sterio" Am .. Face it, sterio just sounds superiour to mono broadcasts. I sure wish it would make it locally if "AM sterio" is available.. Did the radios have to be special to recieve it???

We listen to AM at work, since it is the only thing that will penetrate the metal building we work in. FM is limited in building settings (unless you have internet access or an external antenna)... thus will be limiting to the common worker during working hours.

Finally, AM is the only source of talk radio locally. Conservatives beware...

7 posted on 12/30/2006 9:21:41 AM PST by LowOiL (Paul wrote, "Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil" (Rom. 12:9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

AM spreads farther than FM by several factors. England is smaller than the north american continent. They apparently don't need long distance communication in the world of George Orwell.


8 posted on 12/30/2006 9:40:14 AM PST by x_plus_one (Allah has no son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
Brits that different?......w/Television, they must (or use to?) buy a License...Radio, I Dunno.
9 posted on 12/30/2006 9:50:36 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just b/c your paranoid; Doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
Hmmm, AM seems to do well here in the US covering small local areas.

AM radio in the US does not need to pay license fees to the government, unlike the UK

10 posted on 12/30/2006 9:51:04 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

AM radio provides a useful service during large scale emergencies. When local FM stations are knocked off the air, powerhouse AM stations can be pulled in by portable radios, particularly at night. After Hurricane Katrina, many victims in the affected areas were relying totally on AM radio for information for weeks. Likewise, when all of the emergency services towers were knocked down, police were using AM radio to broadcast messages to their officers in the field.


11 posted on 12/30/2006 10:02:27 AM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

they need a Rush Limbaugh.


12 posted on 12/30/2006 10:08:22 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

AM dies first, FM next-satelite radio is the future.


13 posted on 12/30/2006 10:13:27 AM PST by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
Hmmm, AM seems to do well here in the US covering small local areas. ... Brits that different?

The Brits are just far ahead of us when it comes to digital radio adoption. The UK government chose a completely new method of broadcasting quite a long time ago (5-10 years) that uses different frequencies and is not backwards-compatible with old-fashioned AM and FM. As a result, most of the country now has high quality digital radio using receivers that don't cost much more than than regular ones. There's just no reason for the average Brit to keep listening to AM and FM any more when they can get the same stations in much higher quality via digital radio.

Here in the US, on the other hand, we are just now barely beginning to adopt digital radio, and only in the largest cities. And most of the radios cost more than $500 each. Why? Because the National Association of Broadcasters (essentially a union for rich radio station owners) spent years and years "persuading" Congress to block digital radio tooth and nail until they were able to come up with a backwards-compatible system that they and they along would have iron-fisted control over. It will probably be at least another two years before the average person will even be able to afford the new radios, but that's okay, since it will probably be three or four years before more than one or two of your local stations will even get around to offering a digital signal.

14 posted on 12/30/2006 10:17:03 AM PST by Dont Mention the War (Giuliani '08: Why not p. o. BOTH sides?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
they need a Rush Limbaugh.

In no Western European country
(or Canada, for that matter)
would Rush Limbaugh be permitted to broadcast.

In most of them
he would be jailed under 'hate speech' laws.

15 posted on 12/30/2006 10:21:27 AM PST by Allan (*-O)):~{>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: x_plus_one

AM will never die in the US. It's too easy to make a profit off of a little station, particularly now in the age of syndicated programming.


16 posted on 12/30/2006 10:23:18 AM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
"The current AM licences are up for renewal in 2011 and 2012," an Ofcom spokesman said yesterday. "The question we have to address is whether or not these stations will be commercially viable by then."

That's what people were thinking in the US. They just need to get the UK version of Rush Limbaugh.
17 posted on 12/30/2006 10:28:23 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

ping


18 posted on 12/30/2006 11:05:31 AM PST by bobbyd (Flyer, I love and miss you...Lords best my FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x_plus_one; PeteB570

I think it's geography. One clear channel AM station would cover England like a blanket, even a few 5,000 Watt candles will do nicely. In this country there are dozens of more or less independent identifiable AM markets. Texas or California each have more than the UK.


19 posted on 12/30/2006 11:19:24 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The artist doesn't have to have all the answers; he must, however, ask the right questions honestly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Radio is a bigger world than people want to believe. Sure the internet is the mix. I'm a ham radio operater and I talk on my allowed frequencys, listen on AM(medium wave), shortwave broadcasts on AM shortwave,and use my computer. Radio is not going away because many more people use it than more can imagine. I say this about television, Since I've been in radio I may watch TV when I fall into bed and my wife turns it of because I fell asleep. Radio uses you mind television makes you a zombie.


20 posted on 12/30/2006 11:30:05 AM PST by JOE43270 (JV43270 God Bless America and ALL WHO HAVE and WILL DEFEND HER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson