Well, there's a new one. An A dash K dash 47. Anyway, after spraying the guys house with bullets and a whiskey bottle it appears justified to me.
Sooo, dead guy in the news "allegedly" terrorizes a family, so how come the homeowner didn't "allegedly" kill the bad guy?
Is the MSM trying to say (however veiled) that perhaps the dead guy wasn't terrorizing this family and the homeowner may/could be in the wrong? After all, there WAS a gun involved.