Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden Previews Democrats' Tack Against Troop Plan
The Wall Street Journal ^ | December 27, 2006 | Yochi Dreazen

Posted on 12/27/2006 1:36:00 PM PST by Man of the Right

WASHINGTON -- The incoming Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said no new U.S. troops should be sent to Iraq, setting up a potential political battle over President Bush's tentative plan to deploy tens of thousands of additional forces to try to stabilize the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: biden; democrats; iraq; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Joe was a busy boy yesterday. For non-subscribers, Dreazen says Biden and other Democrats will grill Condi Rice before the Foreign Relations, thereby beating Armed Services to the punch. Biden is the living embodiment of the adage that every Senator sees a President in the mirror -- though his chance is slim and none. His proposal for partitioning the country and sharing oil revenues may be adopted in the end, though not until the next Administration and not without an accomodation with the Iranians. Why should the Mullah's settle for the Sunni South when they could control an expense ranging from the Afghan border through Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and perhaps the West Bank?
1 posted on 12/27/2006 1:36:05 PM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right
I wonder if he got his proposed terms of surrender already written?


2 posted on 12/27/2006 1:41:55 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
I wonder if he got his proposed terms of surrender already written?

If so it is a good bet they weren't written by him.

3 posted on 12/27/2006 1:45:24 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter ( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right

One word: Veto


4 posted on 12/27/2006 1:49:39 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right
I didn't know that Biden was Commander in Chief. I guess I need to get out more.
5 posted on 12/27/2006 1:54:56 PM PST by Jaysun (I've never paid for sex in my life. And that's really pissed off a lot of prostitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right

I am sure that Biden has spoken to any foreign minister that will listen to him about this...of course, going around and behind Bolton's back, and Condi's back.

I am sure he has reassured Iran that when HE becomes POTUS, that they will get whatever they want.


6 posted on 12/27/2006 2:02:04 PM PST by Txsleuth (Bolton/Cheney (that would be Lynne) 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Joe never served. He's a lawyer. He files briefs.


7 posted on 12/27/2006 2:03:53 PM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

Biden's only chance to become Commander-in-Chief is to emigrate.


8 posted on 12/27/2006 2:05:00 PM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Biden's been floating his solution for at least two years.


9 posted on 12/27/2006 2:06:02 PM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right

I can't believe I used to like this guy.


10 posted on 12/27/2006 2:08:36 PM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right
I wish President Bush would just get on with it and announce the surge before any hearings can take place and thus really p*ssing them off.
11 posted on 12/27/2006 2:11:01 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Either do it, or shelve the idea.


12 posted on 12/27/2006 2:15:08 PM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right

Apparently, while the rest of us weren't paying attention, the Constitution was changed. The President is no longer Commander-in-Chief, but must obey whatever Committee Chairman decides to try his/her hand at running the country.

I guess that Bill Clinton is certainly relieved that the Constitution wasn't changed on his watch, he even managed to declare war (Serbia) without getting permission from Congress.


13 posted on 12/27/2006 2:17:52 PM PST by centurion316 (Democrats - Supporting Al Qaida Worldwide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right

It is vital to the Democrats that the US lose in Iraq - that outcome serves their interests, and they are prepared to sacrifice the entire country to their lust for power. They will do everything they can to make it happen.


14 posted on 12/27/2006 2:21:54 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right

"Biden's been floating his solution for at least two years."

yeah...in the toilet bowl ...just like the big turd he is!!!!


15 posted on 12/27/2006 2:27:35 PM PST by hnj_00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right

I wonder if Bush actually doesn't want to add troops but lets on like he does to let the RATS prevent him from doing it. Spin their wheels for awhile, so to speak.


16 posted on 12/27/2006 2:43:22 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
I can't believe I used to like this guy.

The hell you say! That's not something you admit. Kind of like my tagline.
17 posted on 12/27/2006 2:43:51 PM PST by Jaysun (I've never paid for sex in my life. And that's really pissed off a lot of prostitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right

I wonder if Bush actually doesn't want to add troops but lets on like he does to let the RATS prevent him from doing it. Spin their wheels for awhile, so to speak.


18 posted on 12/27/2006 2:44:01 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right
Either do it, or shelve the idea.

Exactly. Bush has the authority, duly granted by Congress. If he dicks around with the 'rats looking for "bipartisanship," then we're sunk and he deserves whatever feces they sling at him from their perches in the lower branches.

19 posted on 12/27/2006 3:36:16 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Waco

Maybe he wants the Democrats to be the party that lost Iraq, much as they lost China. In contrast, Nixon got the deal in 1973 that the North Vietnamese offered in 1968, so unfairly it became Nixon's war rather than Johnson's and Kennedy's. Bobby Kennedy and Robert McNAmara actually played both sides of the street as architects of a no-win war and later apostles of peace.


20 posted on 12/27/2006 4:25:31 PM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson