[ml/nj]

Absolutely disagree. The pardon effectively established the notion that Presidents are not to be held legally accountable for their actions. And so now we have another ex-President who should have done time cavorting around the world as if he were some sort of king.

ML/NJ

[TravisBickle]

I think it's a pretty tough call. As I remember, Ford had plenty of issues to deal with. Nixon had spent a lot of time on Wategate, neglecting much of the nation's business. (Sounds familiar).

And, Ford didn't want the government to be to dragged down with it's pursuit of Nixon, who by then had his reputation ruined.

So, he decided he and the Congress couldn't focus on the needs of the government and the prosecution of Nixon at the same time. I think the difference between Nixon and Clinton, though, are that Nixon's reputation had been ruined, and that was plenty enough punishment, in Ford's eyes. Clinton, on the other hand, has no shame, and the press was supporting him, thus he never felt the kind of punishment that fell on Nixon.

But you're right, that it set a bad long term precedent. All the more reason we need to elect leaders who have solid morals.

[Revenge of Sith]

Nixon was held accountable by being forced to resign.