Posted on 12/24/2006 12:21:44 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough
Did the Committee review any of the 20-some security videos that the FBI took from cameras in the vicinity of the Murrah Building?
Most of those videos have never been shown. Why not? Do they show more than the 'official' story?
When the Murrah bombing first hit the news, most of the networks were specualating foreign terrorism. Within an hour, that story changed to speculation of home-grown terrorists. (Was that when Jamie Gorelick put out the word to drop references to foreign terrorists?) President Clinton could not allow that foreign terrorists attacked mid-America on his watch (he already had WTC 1 attack on his watch), so he had to make sure that the attackers were ONLY home-grown white boys and that Rush Limbaugh was the cause of public anxiety. If the Murrah bombing reports implicated foreigner terrorists attacking America's heartland unabated, Clinton's presidency would have been over. He had to cover it up and Jamie Gorelick was the one charged with the task.
Now you know that the whole OKC bombing thing was 2 things...a photo op for Pres. Bill Clinton's "I feel your pain" look...
And, too big of a "mess" for the Clinton Administration to want to deal with.
Interesting that this comes out on Sunday, Christmas Eve.
Hmm, you don't suppose someone was afraid Timothy might start running his mouth so it was shut permanently?
Amazing, huh.
Another article about this:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53485
And the corresponding FR thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1757721/posts
Both of these from Dec 23, 2006.
I'm still trying to find the names "Clinton" and/or "Reno" in this article. Doesn't the buck stop at the top? I guess only when it's a Republican.
Wasn't the "main" person convicted of the OKC bombing put to death so much faster than usual for a capital crime.
Didn't the bulldozers show up at OKC and Waco awfully soon.
What the really big mystery to me is that, GWB and the GOP have not called the Dims on this and have allowed the coverup to proceed.
Is it possible that the GOP elite and the Dems are not on opposing sides?
I do not live there but I knew that from the beginning.
Why, just this morning FoxNews announced that the good ole US of A is going to contribute to the renovation costs of the UN building ($1.9Billion). Our contribution is going to be 22% (around $418Million).
We should just give the building to Walmart. They would cover the renovation costs themselves.
The shift of FBI and White House (Clinton) attention away from searching for the swarthy-complexioned man that accompanied McVeigh in parking the Ryder truck bomb was so abrupt and logically unjustified that it took my breath away, figuratively speaking. But it allowed B. J. Clinton to avoid having to take punitive action, possibly even military action against the perpetrators or their (in my mind Islamic terrorist) backers. It is evident to me that he was determined that on his watch no U.S. military person would be sent into harms way and potential KIA status in defense of the vital security interests or survival of the U. S. (In this I believe he succeeded). The citizen militias provided a ready-made target for vilification and suspicion, a group of citizens that had failed to vote for Clinton, precisely as the Columbine high school shooting gave him an opportunity to demonize members of the Nat'l Rifle Association and lawful citizen gun owners generally, another group that had declined to vote for him but had no culpablity whatsoever in the Columbine tragedy.
It's been obvious for years that all of the politicians are doing the bidding of other forces normally thought to be outside government, such as international bankin interests. That's why all of the sound and fury over who "controls" the political offices doesn't amount to much - there will be some slight differences in tactics, but they are all steering us in the same general direction. Politicians who step out of line (like Curt Weldon) are quickly whistled for a foul and removed from the game. ;)
It's been obvious for years that all of the politicians are doing the bidding of other forces normally thought to be outside government, such as international bankin interests. That's why all of the sound and fury over who "controls" the political offices doesn't amount to much - there will be some slight differences in tactics, but they are all steering us in the same general direction. Politicians who step out of line (like Curt Weldon) are quickly whistled for a foul and removed from the game. ;)
I wish you were wrong because that means the only solution requires working out side the political system.
I cite the Important Person Rule: "Important people don't call other important people to account."
Given the escalation of terror in the Mideast, all that crap about blaming Rush Limbaugh and others. From this distance, it does not compute.
Rohrbacher doesn't want to know; neither does he want to look like a fool if new evidence comes out in the near future.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.