1 posted on
12/24/2006 8:36:21 AM PST by
SmithL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Nancy Pelosi is deeply disturbed.
2 posted on
12/24/2006 8:36:51 AM PST by
SmithL
(Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
To: SmithL
Just equip the podium and all the members' chairs with built-in toilets. This way the proceedings would not have to be interrupted, and the quality of their legislative output would noticeably improve.
4 posted on
12/24/2006 8:40:28 AM PST by
GSlob
To: SmithL
Here in Texas, women's restrooms have MORE toilets than men's, for the same population...like double. Is that PARITY, or CHARITY?
5 posted on
12/24/2006 8:40:56 AM PST by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: SmithL
Equal treatment?
To: SmithL
She can stand at a urinal like anyone with penis envy.
9 posted on
12/24/2006 8:58:26 AM PST by
weegee
To: SmithL
They should remove all restrooms from the Capitol. The less time Congress spends in session, the less damage they can do.
The only bathrooms remaining should be for people who actually WORK in the Capitol -- security, maintenance and cleaning people.
11 posted on
12/24/2006 9:09:42 AM PST by
MediaMole
(9/11 - We have already forgotten.)
To: SmithL
Since there are insufficient bathroom facilities, the most cost-effective solution is to ban the election of women to Congress.
14 posted on
12/24/2006 9:26:35 AM PST by
mhx
To: SmithL
For crying out loud- they are our elected officials who work on important issues and as such, they should be required to wear depends so that they won't waste any of our time running to the bathroom during important events! They can always jump in a river after work & clean off- get hte job done- stop wasting taxpayers money by frivelous actions such as potty runs! http://sacredscoop.com
15 posted on
12/24/2006 9:34:53 AM PST by
CottShop
To: SmithL
Every screw is historic.
How fitting that Caligula Pelosi would sacrifice history so the taxpayer can deal with her "evacuations"
16 posted on
12/24/2006 9:39:09 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: SmithL
I really feel sorry for the BEB. She can go pee up a rope as far as I am concerned.
17 posted on
12/24/2006 9:41:29 AM PST by
Piquaboy
(22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
To: SmithL
America sure did screw the pooch when they threw their childish tantrum on November 7th. We are going to be paying for it for the next two years.
18 posted on
12/24/2006 9:41:50 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(When I was a kid, "global warming" was known as "the weather.")
To: SmithL
I can see where this is going to be a bigger problem than it ever has been. These days more of our congress critters are full of sh*t than at any other time in history. LOL!
20 posted on
12/24/2006 9:50:48 AM PST by
NRA2BFree
(May you always have love to share, health to spare, and friends that care.)
To: SmithL
I'll bet more than half these women would prefer to use the men's room anyhow. In fact, some of them will probably insist on it.
22 posted on
12/24/2006 9:58:32 AM PST by
madprof98
("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
To: SmithL
I have an instant solution. Rent a couple of porta potties and put them right in the house chamber. Put one of them on the dias right behind the Speaker's podium. Most convenient.
24 posted on
12/24/2006 10:02:49 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: SmithL
"Where will you be when diarrhea strikes?"
25 posted on
12/24/2006 10:04:25 AM PST by
mikrofon
(PELOSI (D) -- anagrams to -- SPOILED)
To: SmithL
She'll probably add a trnasgender bathroom.
San Fransicko Democrat values.
To: SmithL
Oh, we can probably look forward to 'Barney's Bathhouse' too.
To: SmithL
Get out your wallets. Think the military paid a lot for toilet seats? You ain't seen nothin' yet, now that Nancy's in charge of the checkbook!
Why doesn't she hold a Bakesale with the proceeds going toward a "Ladies Room?" 'The Beast' could bake her arsenic-laced Chocolate Chip Cookies for the cause.
Solidarity, Ladies!
(Is "The First 100 Hours" up YET?)
29 posted on
12/24/2006 10:18:00 AM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: All
"Reaching the women's equivalent is more challenging. It entails traversing a hall where tourists gather, or entering the minority leader's office, navigating a corridor that winds past secretarial desks and punching in a keypad code ..."Oh my goodness ... they would have to actually be seen by and have to walk amongst the unwashed masses and lowly secretaries to get to the bathroom. The horror of it all ...
To: SmithL
I thought the article would be about no longer forcing us to use those stupid low-water toilets, reaching "potty parity" with Canada, where functioning toilets are legal.
Instead it's about where Members of Congress go to the bathroom. I'm struggling to come up with a less important topic than that. Comfort level of gopher holes, maybe.
32 posted on
12/24/2006 10:26:56 AM PST by
Athwart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson