Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/24/2006 8:36:21 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Nancy Pelosi is deeply disturbed.


2 posted on 12/24/2006 8:36:51 AM PST by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Just equip the podium and all the members' chairs with built-in toilets. This way the proceedings would not have to be interrupted, and the quality of their legislative output would noticeably improve.


4 posted on 12/24/2006 8:40:28 AM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Here in Texas, women's restrooms have MORE toilets than men's, for the same population...like double. Is that PARITY, or CHARITY?


5 posted on 12/24/2006 8:40:56 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Equal treatment?


6 posted on 12/24/2006 8:45:29 AM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

She can stand at a urinal like anyone with penis envy.


9 posted on 12/24/2006 8:58:26 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

They should remove all restrooms from the Capitol. The less time Congress spends in session, the less damage they can do.

The only bathrooms remaining should be for people who actually WORK in the Capitol -- security, maintenance and cleaning people.


11 posted on 12/24/2006 9:09:42 AM PST by MediaMole (9/11 - We have already forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Since there are insufficient bathroom facilities, the most cost-effective solution is to ban the election of women to Congress.


14 posted on 12/24/2006 9:26:35 AM PST by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

For crying out loud- they are our elected officials who work on important issues and as such, they should be required to wear depends so that they won't waste any of our time running to the bathroom during important events! They can always jump in a river after work & clean off- get hte job done- stop wasting taxpayers money by frivelous actions such as potty runs! http://sacredscoop.com


15 posted on 12/24/2006 9:34:53 AM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Every screw is historic.

How fitting that Caligula Pelosi would sacrifice history so the taxpayer can deal with her "evacuations"


16 posted on 12/24/2006 9:39:09 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I really feel sorry for the BEB. She can go pee up a rope as far as I am concerned.


17 posted on 12/24/2006 9:41:29 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

America sure did screw the pooch when they threw their childish tantrum on November 7th. We are going to be paying for it for the next two years.


18 posted on 12/24/2006 9:41:50 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (When I was a kid, "global warming" was known as "the weather.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
I can see where this is going to be a bigger problem than it ever has been. These days more of our congress critters are full of sh*t than at any other time in history. LOL!
20 posted on 12/24/2006 9:50:48 AM PST by NRA2BFree (May you always have love to share, health to spare, and friends that care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I'll bet more than half these women would prefer to use the men's room anyhow. In fact, some of them will probably insist on it.


22 posted on 12/24/2006 9:58:32 AM PST by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
I have an instant solution. Rent a couple of porta potties and put them right in the house chamber. Put one of them on the dias right behind the Speaker's podium. Most convenient.
24 posted on 12/24/2006 10:02:49 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
"Where will you be when diarrhea strikes?"
25 posted on 12/24/2006 10:04:25 AM PST by mikrofon (PELOSI (D) -- anagrams to -- SPOILED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

She'll probably add a trnasgender bathroom.
San Fransicko Democrat values.


27 posted on 12/24/2006 10:12:09 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Oh, we can probably look forward to 'Barney's Bathhouse' too.


28 posted on 12/24/2006 10:13:12 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Get out your wallets. Think the military paid a lot for toilet seats? You ain't seen nothin' yet, now that Nancy's in charge of the checkbook!

Why doesn't she hold a Bakesale with the proceeds going toward a "Ladies Room?" 'The Beast' could bake her arsenic-laced Chocolate Chip Cookies for the cause.

Solidarity, Ladies!

(Is "The First 100 Hours" up YET?)


29 posted on 12/24/2006 10:18:00 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
"Reaching the women's equivalent is more challenging. It entails traversing a hall where tourists gather, or entering the minority leader's office, navigating a corridor that winds past secretarial desks and punching in a keypad code ..."

Oh my goodness ... they would have to actually be seen by and have to walk amongst the unwashed masses and lowly secretaries to get to the bathroom. The horror of it all ...

30 posted on 12/24/2006 10:18:33 AM PST by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
I thought the article would be about no longer forcing us to use those stupid low-water toilets, reaching "potty parity" with Canada, where functioning toilets are legal.

Instead it's about where Members of Congress go to the bathroom. I'm struggling to come up with a less important topic than that. Comfort level of gopher holes, maybe.

32 posted on 12/24/2006 10:26:56 AM PST by Athwart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson