This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 12/21/2006 4:30:49 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 12/21/2006 3:45:36 PM PST by bert
Now THAT is funny......
500 or 10k ( take your pick ) F.B.I. files, and the perpetual invertebrates say....."NO!!".
Did anybody else hear the same report on Brit Hume as is being reported here? No other story on this has been reported this way by any outlet. Everyone is reporting on the IG report with a mention from Berger's lawyer that he considers the matter closed.
Ah...but an argument could be made that Nixon had alienated the powerful.
"Docs in socks" by Dr. Suess
Or Osama...
Whichever.
"our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer"-Thomas Paine
you are looking at the wrong people. the people being protected here, are the permanent beauracracy at State and CIA. they run this part of the government, not the political appointees who come and go with each administration. you think Condi Rice runs State? Was Porter Goss in control of the CIA?
we tend to focus on the political appointees, and that's understandable. But if the "cabal" lets them go down, that's one layer of protection peeled away.
Lack of funding. The Library of Congress gets all the money it wants.
Haul it out where? I like the thought but I bet you 60% of the electorate know nothing about this. Should this make Katie Colon's broadcast, her audience would perceive it as more Clinton bashing over nothing.
Implied in the report was the fact Berger was rolled.
What practical use is his testimony to history? We must wait. His light sentence is evidence of some future use.
I am so glad the Republ;ican Congress we had during the past three years since Berger committed his crimes held hearings and dug deep into all this. Plus, that Bush Justice Department sure does mean business, doesn't it?
Every time I think about Berger's crime and the wrist slap he got it makes me vomit a little.
Maybe he can write her speeches. Turned out OK for McGovern . . .
That's why "They" will see to it that Clinton Administration 2.0 will come to pass in '08.
I'm getting mighty tired of seeing all these Washington elitists breaking laws the rest of us would be prosecuted over!
Golly gee, if I didn't know better I'd believe they operate entirely above the law and inside a rarefied air bubble! /sarc
Where's my tar bucket?
But the problem is, it wasn't the Clinton administration that helped cover up Burglars document stuffing. The Clintons may have directed him to steal the document but it was the Bush administration that did nothing about it. Now, what is that all about? I don't want to think bad thoughts but what is one to believe. This man stole confidential archive documents and he gets a slap on the wrists? Something is very smelly about this one.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.