| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 12/21/2006 4:30:49 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 12/21/2006 3:45:36 PM PST by bert
exactly right. and that's why "we" need to support anyone who can stop that.
Very possible. But how did they know where he had gone with the docs? Although I suppose it's possible that the investigators simply figured that it had to be someplace close and checked the tapes.
STill, I wonder why all this is coming out now. Can they get him on perjury?
Her heinous is no McGovern.
Yeah.............ZZZZZZZZZZZ.
Kept me awake.....
Why is this crap coming up now?...Again? This happened several years ago, and the fat fool virtually got away with it after a slap on the wrist fine. NOW, its in the MSM again. What's new?...Another Clinton criminal gets away with a crime. Any average person doing what he did would already be doing time. Pathetic commentary on our law enforcement practices.
Who cares about Berger? Foley did FAR WORSE damage by flirting with an 18-year-old. La-la-la I can't hear the Dim corruption la-la-la...
Hmmm... just what happened to cause him to (apparently) change his mind and try to retrieve the torn-up documents?
THAT is an excellent theory. The Clintons are well aware that if there is ANY possibility of scandalous information hitting the fan, it needs to be aired out way before serious campaign time so that it may quickly become "old news".
This newly publicized Berger stuff may have been something the Republicans were keeping up their sleeves, and the Clintons decided to bring it out themselves, on their own terms, and closely following an election when any scandal is LEAST damaging.
On the other hand, maybe it was Kerry who set this cycle in motion.
Or somebody else who wants to get Hillary out of the way.
Cane him.
if you can believe this - scanning the news channels right now - CNN wolf blitzer is providing the most coverage of this right now.
That is what the RNC that I used to love would have done - but they've become such a bunch on pansy-waists that I extremely doubt if they will do so.
It may be all about the Democrat primary war for the next Presidential election.
See posts #75 and #88.
First off: Sandy Berger is a Democrat. Therfore, regardless of whatever he does, his motives are pure. Secondly: why would somebody having pure motives deserve to go to jail. After all, it is a truism that the ends justify the means. The ends are that of obliteration of evidence.
I'm sorely remiss seeing where the problem lies.
/DU off
(was that flag really necessary?)
Given what I know 'bout swimmers, that's a bona fide flag that was absolutely necessary (lest some quivering hunk of blubber broached on the beach, begging to be harpooned, emminates mental waves compelling those around the mass of blubber to think otherwise).
(( ping ))
WASHINGTON — President Clinton's national security adviser removed classified documents from the National Archives, hid them under a construction trailer and later tried to find the trash collector to retrieve them, the agency's internal watchdog said Wednesday.
Fox web site
The only reason it is being released now is because people are traveling, shopping, and getting ready for Christmas. And talking about Rosie and the Donald. Sandy who?
See post #88.
Don't kid yourself-they're incompetent or scared or both.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.