There are lots of lies surrounding the Global Warming mantra. The biggest one claims there is consensus among scientists that human-caused global warming is a fact. There is no such consensus.
"To me, consensus seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects."
-- Margaret Thatcher
"With respect to science, consensus is often simply a sop to scientific illiteracy. After all, if what you are told is alleged to be supported by all scientists, then why do you have to bother to understand it? You can simply go back to treating it as a matter of religious belief, and you never have to defend this belief except to claim that you are supported by all scientists except for a handful of corrupted heretics."
--- Dr. Richard Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Sciences of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
The scientific method is the confirmation of hypothesis by independant observation, the test of theory to destruction. Consensus and belief are of the realm of politics and religion, skeptiscm and critical test are the realm of science.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: ancient_geezer
But al gore wouldn't lie would he?(snicker)
2 posted on
12/20/2006 8:00:41 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: ancient_geezer
Most excellent find bump, Geezer!
No credible evidence has been presented to me to cause me to believe that man can influence global temperature change.
This is another "follow the money" scam, IMHO. What is infuriating to me (and should be to all Americans) is that our tax dollars are supporting these Chicken Littles. I'd just as soon not fund their "research," TYVM!
BTW, Maine and West Virginia got some 'splainin' to do about their Bozo Senators!
As does, come to think on it, Floriduh, re: their Howdy Doody Senator expert on Syrian/US relations!
3 posted on
12/20/2006 8:02:00 PM PST by
Taxman
(So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
To: ancient_geezer
The great American cynic H.L. Mencken once said, "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the public alarmed and hence clamorous to be led to safety by threatening it with an endless series of boogiemen, all of them imaginary."
Global Warming is just one of these "boogiemen" H.L. Menchen spoke of.
4 posted on
12/20/2006 8:05:01 PM PST by
DJ Taylor
(Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
To: ancient_geezer
Consensus for the hoi polloi.
I say 2+2=4.
You say 2+2=6.
The Iraq Mathematics Committee reaches the consensus that 2+2=5.
5 posted on
12/20/2006 8:07:39 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: ancient_geezer
The last time human kind was strapped into such a mental straight jacket was during the Inquisition of the Dark Ages.Nope. Stalin's Russia came after that.
To: ancient_geezer; cogitator
A proper warning - the AGWs have government thugs on their side, whether they want them or not.
The skeptics may err in their science, but not in their concern over censorship.
To: ancient_geezer
8 posted on
12/20/2006 8:23:23 PM PST by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: ancient_geezer
How long until we can throw global warming on the 'over-hyped media scare frenzy' pile along with africanized killer bees, nuclear power, Y2K, heterosexual aids epidemic, acid rain, bird flu, swine flu, not enough flu vaccine, the coming ice age...? Feel free to add to the list, I am tired of typing.
9 posted on
12/20/2006 8:32:16 PM PST by
ConservaTexan
(February 6, 1911)
To: JerseyJohn61
10 posted on
12/20/2006 8:36:02 PM PST by
JerseyJohn61
(Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
To: ancient_geezer
To: ancient_geezer
OK, I agree with all points in this article. Major questions still remain though... Why are they all pushing a lie? Who stands to benefit? Who's behind it? How are they accomplishing this feat of mass manipulation?
Arrgh! My head spins!
15 posted on
12/20/2006 9:00:34 PM PST by
mwilli20
To: DaveLoneRanger
19 posted on
12/20/2006 9:09:05 PM PST by
bkwells
(Liberals=Hypocrites)
To: ancient_geezer
24 posted on
12/20/2006 9:30:57 PM PST by
WildBill2275
(The Second Amendment guarantees all of your other rights)
To: ancient_geezer
One requirement for any meaningful scientific theory is that it must be possible to conceive of some evidence or event which would prove it false. For example, while it's believed that gravitational forces will attract objects in proportion to their mass, regardless of the materials of which they are constructed, such belief could be disproven if some material were discovered which was not subject to the same gravitational effects as other materials. I would not expect such a material to ever be discovered, but if it were it would disprove many of the currently-accepted laws of gravity.
By contrast, anything that happens is taken as confirmation of "global warming". Mild weather is caused by global warming. So's severe weather. Since no type of weather would disprove global warming, the theory itself is meaningless.
33 posted on
12/21/2006 12:24:34 AM PST by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: Andrewksu
36 posted on
12/21/2006 7:07:02 AM PST by
centurion316
(Democrats - Supporting Al Qaida Worldwide)
To: ancient_geezer
I'm one of the few "believers" in GW here, at least to a certain extent, however, this silencing of the opposition is quite creepy..
42 posted on
12/21/2006 9:28:24 AM PST by
Paradox
(Let's really defeat Global Warming, build 100 new Nuclear Powerplants! {crickets....})
To: ancient_geezer
The scientific method is the confirmation of hypothesis by independant observation, the test of theory to destruction. Consensus and belief are of the realm of politics and religion, skeptiscm and critical test are the realm of science. Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it with probability 1.0.
46 posted on
12/21/2006 9:58:31 AM PST by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The artist doesn't have to have all the answers; he must, however, ask the right questions honestly.)
To: ancient_geezer
The fun part of threads like this is listening to those who claim evolution is a scientific fact (because all "real" scientists believe it) railing against the "junk science" of the global warming cabal. They're really the same situation, just different issues.
73 posted on
12/21/2006 6:06:58 PM PST by
Timmy
To: ancient_geezer
Bookmark for later. Thanks for posting.
To: ancient_geezer
AL Gore Global Warming BS doink for later.
111 posted on
12/22/2006 4:23:38 PM PST by
Doomonyou
(I voted and all I got was a FUBAR Congress.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson