Skip to comments.
New York Village Would Rather Remove 9-Foot Menorah than Allow Nativity Scene
Life Site News ^
| 12.19.06
| JORGE FITZ-GIBBON
Posted on 12/20/2006 4:54:27 PM PST by Coleus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-199 next last
Menorah, yes; crèche, no: New York village officials deny resident opportunity to display nativity
ADF and ADF-allied attorneys file suit, request temporary restraining order against Village of Briarcliff Manor
VILLAGE OF BRIARCLIFF MANOR, N.Y. Acting on behalf of a local resident, Alliance Defense Fund attorneys and allied attorneys are seeking a temporary restraining order against officials in the Village of Briarcliff Manor who refuse to allow a crèche display in a public park. The attorneys filed their TRO motion today after filing a complaint in federal court Friday against the villages board of trustees and its manager.
It is outrageous that a private citizen has been denied the opportunity to celebrate Christmas in a public park, said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Brian W. Raum. The Villages decision to purchase, maintain, and display secular seasonal elements and a menorah in the park while prohibiting a privately sponsored nativity scene is not only hypocritical, but unconstitutional.
The village-sponsored holiday display includes a 9-foot-high menorah, bows, garland, and a Peace on Earth banner. Henry Ritell, a Catholic and a village resident, first attempted to display a creche in the park in December 2005. In accordance with his Roman Catholic faith, Ritell requested that the display be permitted between Christmas and Epiphany, which takes place on Jan. 8, 2006. In a Jan. 13 letter from the villages manager, Ritells request was denied.
Officials also rejected Ritells renewed request in two letters sent to the village on Oct. 30 and Nov. 14, 2006. The complaint and request for a temporary restraining order filed in Ritell v. The Village of Briarcliff Manor in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York may be viewed at www.telladf.org/userdocs/RitellComplaint.pdf ADF attorneys are co-counsel in the case along with lead counsel Feerick Lynch MacCartney and allied attorney John Stepanovich.
Mr. Ritells request is entirely constitutional, Raum explained. The Villages claim that a public park is somehow not a public forum for free expression is unfounded. More importantly, it is a blatant denial of Mr. Ritells First Amendment rights. ADF is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy, training, funding, and litigation. www.telladf.org www.saychristmas.org
1
posted on
12/20/2006 4:54:31 PM PST
by
Coleus
To: Coleus
but a kwanzaa disply they would allow.
2
posted on
12/20/2006 4:55:54 PM PST
by
yochanan
To: Coleus
Hannukkah is almost OVER for Pete's sake, so no big deal taking it down.
3
posted on
12/20/2006 4:56:40 PM PST
by
Suzy Quzy
To: Coleus
Good for the judge. A menorah and a creche are religious symbols. A Christmas tree is a secular symbol.
4
posted on
12/20/2006 4:57:23 PM PST
by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
To: yochanan
If the Islams wanted to put something up, you can bet they would get first priority.
5
posted on
12/20/2006 4:59:22 PM PST
by
oyez
(Why is it that egalitarians act like royalty?)
To: Coleus
Rush is right. This is getting real stupid. Let them have their friggin' menorah.
6
posted on
12/20/2006 4:59:41 PM PST
by
dr_who_2
To: Coleus
Interesting to see Christians on the other side of this situation. Remember this the next time Jews or pagans want to put up their religious symbols along with a public nativity scene (OTOH, the pagans already have the Christmas tree, so you're kind of on the same side there).
To: dr_who_2
No. They shouldnt have a menorah. The equivelant Jewish symbol to a Christmas tree is a dreidel.
8
posted on
12/20/2006 5:04:02 PM PST
by
Chickensoup
(If you don't go to the holy war, the holy war will come to you.)
To: Coleus
You mean there are actually Gentiles in Briarcliff Manor? ;-)
(For those of you in outerwhitelandia, Briarcliff Manor, along with Scarsdale, Chappaqua, and Larchmont, make up the "bagel belt" of Westchester County).
9
posted on
12/20/2006 5:04:11 PM PST
by
Clemenza
(Never Trust Anyone With a Latin Tagline)
To: dr_who_2
apparently these people are so stupid they didn't know that the original menorah stood in the Temple in Jerusalem pre-Jesus. speaking of religious symbols..........
10
posted on
12/20/2006 5:04:21 PM PST
by
avital2
To: Coleus; SJackson
1. Where are the people who were annoyed with the Rabbi at the SEa-Tac case?
2. A Dreidl or spinning top would be a secular representation of Hanukkah, akin to a Tree. A Menorah is explicitly religious.
11
posted on
12/20/2006 5:05:43 PM PST
by
rmlew
(Having slit their throats may the conservatives who voted for Casey choke slowly on their blood.)
To: Coleus
I'm so sick and tired of pu**ies in postitions of authority............
To: taxesareforever
Actually, a Christmas tree is a religious symbol (whether or not it's your religion is the question), but a creche is hardly religious. It's simply a grouping of statues of Jews and animals.
I think that's what gets some folks up in arms about the creche scenes ~ they either don't like Jews, or they don't like animals.
13
posted on
12/20/2006 5:09:51 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: rmlew
Is a good looking Hooters girl secular or religious??
14
posted on
12/20/2006 5:09:59 PM PST
by
zarf
To: Coleus
Cripes the muzzies must be laughing their butts off. Divide and conquer.
To: dr_who_2
Rush is right. This is getting real stupid. Let them have their friggin' menorah. >>>
obviously, you didn't read the article which had NOTHING to do with the menorah. It had to do with putting a Christian symbol up next to the menorah, a nativity scene, also called a crèche. No where was it written that he wanted the menorah down. He paid for the crèche with his own money and wanted to donate it to the town to be placed next to the menorah. Not take the menorah down.
16
posted on
12/20/2006 5:10:58 PM PST
by
Coleus
(Christmas is part of our Western Civilization and is an U.S. Holiday for all Americans)
To: rmlew
17
posted on
12/20/2006 5:11:51 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: rmlew
1-They're on the multi thousand post Sea-Tac threads, though the Rabbi never asked for anyting to be taken down.
2-Given the, imo credible, history of the dreidl as a ploy against persecution, I think it's inappropriate.
3, mine-Even if it's a secular holiday season, the holiday's are religious. I think no displays on public property is a defensible position, but if you're going to have them, why not a Nativity Scene and a Menorah.
18
posted on
12/20/2006 5:12:54 PM PST
by
SJackson
(had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
19
posted on
12/20/2006 5:13:13 PM PST
by
SJackson
(had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
To: rmlew
It is both secular and religious. The menorah is also a national symbol of the Jewish people-religious and non religious.
Nevertheless as an Orthodox Jew I say let there be creches and/or Menorahs in every town that wants them and f-ck the JINO's and formerly Christian athiests that block them.
Please just have the heads covered on the Jewish characters in the nativity scenes.
20
posted on
12/20/2006 5:13:38 PM PST
by
yochanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-199 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson