Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report Says Berger Hid Archive Documents (under a construction trailer)
Associated Press ^ | Dec 20, 2006 | LARRY MARGASAK

Posted on 12/20/2006 2:12:49 PM PST by Mr. Mojo

Former national security adviser Sandy Berger removed classified documents from the National Archives in 2003 and hid them under a construction trailer, the Archives inspector general reported Wednesday. The report was issued more than a year after Berger pleaded guilty and received a criminal sentence for removal of the documents.

Inspector General Paul Brachfeld reported that when Berger was confronted by Archives officials about the missing documents, he said it was possible he threw them in his office trash.

The report said that when Archives employees first suspected that Berger _ who had been President Clinton's national security adviser _ was removing classified documents from the Archives in the fall of they failed to notify any law enforcement agency.

Berger, who pleaded guilty to unlawfully removing and retaining classified documents, was fined $50,000, ordered to perform 100 hours of community service and was barred from access to classified material for three years.

The report said that when Berger was reviewing the classified documents in the Archives building a few blocks from the Capitol, employees saw him bending down and fiddling with something white, which could have been paper, around his ankle.

However, Archives employees did not feel at the time there was enough information to confront someone of Berger's stature, the report said.

Brachfeld reported that on one visit, Berger took a break to go outside without an escort.

"In total, during this visit, he removed four documents ... .

"Mr. Berger said he placed the documents under a trailer in an accessible construction area outside Archives 1 (the main Archives building)."

Berger acknowledged that he later retrieved the documents from the construction area and returned with them to his office.

Berger, with the authorization of former President Clinton, was reviewing National Security Council documents on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida, Sudan, and related presidential correspondence. The review was to facilitate Berger's impending testimony before the House and Senate intelligence committees.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: berger; bighouse; bill; clinton; crime; documents; felon; felony; hughnews; jailtime; nationalarchives; obstructionofjustice; pantsgate; prison; puthiminjail; ratcrime; ratcriminal; sandyberger; sandybergler; sandyburglar; slaponthewrist; sloppysandy; soxdocs; theburglar; treason; trousergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-375 next last
To: Mr. Mojo
So now we got more of the sequence. Stuffed 'em in his pants, walked outside, pulled 'em out of his pants, hid them under a construction trailer, and then returned (presumably after hours) to retrieve them and bring them home. Apparently he did this multiple times.

So exactly where in this complex and obviously intentional sequence did he forget he had 'em???

41 posted on 12/20/2006 2:25:47 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

He absolutely is angling for a job in Hillary's administration. Why do you think he wants his security clearance back?


42 posted on 12/20/2006 2:26:00 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I'm with Rush. He said, it was more worrisome of what Berger 'put in the files than what he took out.'


43 posted on 12/20/2006 2:26:06 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ieatfrijoles

"I'd almost have to assume that they are a legitamate news outlet."

This is the first evidence I've seen that they are legitimate.


44 posted on 12/20/2006 2:27:12 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam

Citizen arrest for treason.


45 posted on 12/20/2006 2:27:21 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

bttt


46 posted on 12/20/2006 2:27:52 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Crimes with impunity…isn't that what we say about Pootie-Poot ?


47 posted on 12/20/2006 2:28:16 PM PST by dgallo51 (DEMAND IMMEDIATE, OPEN INVESTIGATIONS OF U.S. COMPLICITY IN RWANDAN GENOCIDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
... and then the dog got under the trailer and ate the documents!


48 posted on 12/20/2006 2:29:27 PM PST by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

How can these documents not be backed up somehow on microfiche or something.

They are going to let him get away with re-writing history and protecting Clinton.

Why didn't he go to jail for something this severe?


49 posted on 12/20/2006 2:29:38 PM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

"Berger must know enough, to hang someone else. Politics, as usual!"

Fat Sandy Burglar is covered by the Clinton "J. Edgar Hoover"" insurance policy. "Honey, I knew those F.B.I. files would come in handy!"


50 posted on 12/20/2006 2:30:35 PM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

"Mr. Berger said he placed the documents under a trailer in an accessible construction area outside Archives 1 (the main Archives building)."

Did he leave them there for someone? I don't see any reason why he wouldn't just take the documents home with him.


51 posted on 12/20/2006 2:30:47 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
FWIW, I'm more worried about what he put back.

Finger prints are ALL OVER any documents (that POS) Sandy touched...!

52 posted on 12/20/2006 2:31:06 PM PST by Las Vegas Dave (HDTV ping list, please FReepmail me if you would like your name added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Well, so much for the "I don't recall, it must have been an accident" defense!

Bastard should be in jail - BIG TIME!


53 posted on 12/20/2006 2:31:26 PM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Berger supposedly took copies of a memo from Clarke in which Berger wrote "No" to a proposal that bin Laden be killed.


54 posted on 12/20/2006 2:32:06 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

The Sandy Burgler was guilty as sin and knew EXACTLY what he was doing. I would suggest the chair but that is more expensive than a firing squad (unless the shooters are union).


55 posted on 12/20/2006 2:32:09 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

He ought to be able to get his Top Secret clearance back pretty soon now.


56 posted on 12/20/2006 2:32:34 PM PST by ichabod1 (After the attacks of 9/11, profiling Muslims is more like profiling the Klan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

"Not only is he walking free...but he was included in on the ISG!!!!"

He was also on a previous committee that reviewed planning for the Iraq war. I kid you not.


57 posted on 12/20/2006 2:33:24 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
He's a Dem, and therefore has immunity from bad press or prosecution.

Under a Republican DoJ. That concerns me a great deal

58 posted on 12/20/2006 2:34:16 PM PST by ichabod1 (After the attacks of 9/11, profiling Muslims is more like profiling the Klan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Thanks for the post. Berger should be fried. He's not even grilled. What a POS.


59 posted on 12/20/2006 2:34:51 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Didn't Berger take part in some, high-profile discussions on Iraq strategy while the Baker-Hamilton group was formulating their own, possible scenarios? And wouldn't he have been privy to classified material before his 3-year ban had been served?


60 posted on 12/20/2006 2:35:48 PM PST by johnny7 ("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-375 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson