Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
They don't mention what the health risks are to this baby.

Probably next to nothing. The airport scanners use a far lower dose than medical x-rays.

42 posted on 12/20/2006 11:09:44 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (Pluto's been marginalized! Call the ACLU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Squawk 8888; Brilliant
"Your checked bags could be hit with up to 300mR of X-rays by the new CTX series luggage scanners. " ... from http://home.kc.rr.com/aaronphoto/xray.html

That's not really a major amount.

"The average exposure for Americans is about 360 mrem (3.6 mSv) per year, 81 percent of which comes from natural sources of radiation." http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/bio-effects-radiation.html (sounds right to me... I work with radiation a bit, so I've some expertise... 300mrem/yr natural dose sounds good. Pilots subject themselves to on that order additional cosmic radiation per year, too)

This is about the same as having the kid live in the eastern Rockies for 5 years, where everyone gets on the order of 50mrem /year (Denver,CO) more natural radiation from cosmic rays. If you were to get dose of 30,000mrem, it is possible that a sophisticated blood test could detect that you were exposed to radiation. (Radiation workers in the US seldom get 100mrem/yr above background), but radiation sickness requires about double that dose to be in evidence.

Using worst case assumptions, it appears that the chances of this kid suffering from any long term enhancement in cancer and such risks amount to under 1 in 100... and since the likelihood of cancer resulting from natural radiation exposure appears to be on the order of somewhat under 1%, that means the kid's chances of this would be about 1.01%
... (I suspect living with someone who doesn't speak English is correlated with a far greater enhancement for risk of premature death)
48 posted on 12/20/2006 12:01:53 PM PST by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Squawk 8888; al baby

Probably next to nothing. The airport scanners use a far lower dose than medical x-rays.
__________________________________________________________
Let's ask the expert.

Al,

It that enough to stune your beeber?


59 posted on 12/20/2006 4:51:19 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson