Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK report says robots will have rights
Financial Times ^ | 12/19/06 | Salamander Davoudi

Posted on 12/19/2006 7:37:43 PM PST by LibWhacker

The next time you beat your keyboard in frustration, think of a day where it may be able to sue you for assault. Within 50 years we might even find ourselves standing next to the next generation of vacuum cleaners in the voting booth.

Far from being extracts from the extreme end of science fiction, the idea that we may one day give sentient machines the kind of rights traditionally reserved for humans is raised in a British government-commissioned report which claims to be an extensive look into the future.

Visions of the status of robots around 2056 have emerged from one of 270 forward-looking papers sponsored by Sir David King, the UK government’s chief scientist. The paper covering robots’ rights was written by a UK partnership of Outsights, the management consultancy, and Ipsos Mori, the opinion research organisation.

“If we make conscious robots they would want to have rights and they probably should,” said Henrik Christensen, director of the Centre of Robotics and Intelligent Machines at the Georgia Institute of Technology.

The idea will not surprise science fiction aficionados. It was widely explored by Dr Isaac Asimov, one of the foremost science fiction writers of the 20th century. He wrote of a society where robots were fully integrated and essential in day-to-day life.

In his system, the ‘three laws of robotics’ governed machine life. They decreed that robots could not injure humans, must obey orders and protect their own existence – in that order.

Robots and machines are now classed as inanimate objects without rights or duties but if artificial intelligence becomes ubiquitous, the report argues, there may be calls for humans’ rights to be extended to them.

It is also logical that such rights are meted out with citizens’ duties, including voting, paying tax and compulsory military service.

Mr Christensen said: “Would it be acceptable to kick a robotic dog even though we shouldn’t kick a normal one?

“There will be people who can’t distinguish that so we need to have ethical rules to make sure we as humans interact with robots in an ethical manner so we do not move our boundaries of what is acceptable.”

The Horizon Scan report argues that if ‘correctly managed’, this new world of robots’ rights could lead to increased labour output and greater prosperity.

“If granted full rights, states will be obligated to provide full social benefits to them including income support, housing and possibly robo-healthcare to fix the machines over time,” it says.

But it points out that the process has casualties and the first one may be the environment, especially in the areas of energy and waste.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: imakeyboardmurderer; liberalagenda; norightshere; rights; robots; sentient; stupidmachine; voting; whataboutthechildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: LibWhacker

wow--is this like "A. I."??


21 posted on 12/19/2006 9:50:21 PM PST by GOP_Thug_Mom (libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Screamname

22 posted on 12/19/2006 10:43:14 PM PST by hawkeye101 (Liberalism IS a mental disorder. It can only be cured by large doses of common sense and the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
“If granted full rights, states will be obligated to provide full social benefits to them including income support, housing and possibly robo-healthcare to fix the machines over time,” it says.





Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
23 posted on 12/20/2006 8:16:06 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/optimism_nov8th.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
“If we make conscious robots they would want to have rights and they probably should,”

If my grandmother had balls, she'd be my grandfather.

24 posted on 12/20/2006 8:27:12 AM PST by Paradox (Let's really defeat Global Warming, build 100 new Nuclear Powerplants! {crickets....})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

so much wrong with this concept i am not sure where to start

1) robot voting will pretty much allow removal of human votes as having control of the state's elected offices, not that that seems to help much now
2) can only assume robots would have more rights than humans, or more protections.
3) would be ideal citizen/subject/tax serfs, how can any government not like the idea? have the manufacturers build in some consumption requirements and everyone is happy (except human serfs).


25 posted on 12/20/2006 9:07:13 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Fascinating!

26 posted on 12/20/2006 10:41:10 AM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

This idiocy assumes that "robots" can be given intelligence. In other words, "artificial intelligence".
The left will do anything to put down human intelligence, even if it means promoting this sort of nonsense.


27 posted on 12/20/2006 10:48:05 AM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

It'd sure take all the guesswork and speculation out of election eve... Whomever manufacturers the greatest number of robots, wins.


28 posted on 12/20/2006 1:52:27 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

lol, yea whatever happened to 'for the children'. Now it's 'for the robots'... lol


29 posted on 12/20/2006 4:59:33 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/optimism_nov8th.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Their rights come their Creator. They're toasters.


30 posted on 12/20/2006 6:33:34 PM PST by kcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: supercat
Ha. I remember reading an adaptation of that a long time ago. If I remember right it was in I, Robot and Other Stories, a compilation of mostly Asimov tales, including some very old ones written under his original nome de plume, Paul French.

The premise seemed corny back when I read it, and it still does today. But these people have hijacked an 85 year old theme and marketed it as their own original thought. To what end, I don't know.

31 posted on 12/21/2006 10:26:44 PM PST by Clinging Bitterly (Oregon - a pro-militia and firearms state that looks just like Afghanistan .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson