Posted on 12/19/2006 11:35:51 AM PST by Sarah
Although that thread got a little...heated.
I once read that the stringencies in religion always tend to the 'man-to-G-d' side. That is that people will say more 'hail Marys' yet not so quickly give charity. Or in this case, the humiliation and physical attack on this woman was all in the name of 'modesty'.
I agree that she was pushing the envelope a bit, but anyone in their right mind and able to prioritize G-d's will would never have attacked her. Especially since it was a totally public bus, but even if it were private and separate, that's no license for violence and abuse.
Yes, you can place the controls on Otto Pilate.
Amen.
Must be a result of banging their heads on the wall.
;-) Hey I like that!
Almost. There is a sizable minority of NK Jews in the Old City that despises the secular state of Israel and Jews that do not conform to their opinions re: Orthodox beliefs and behaviors.
I had a confrontation once in the Old City when holding my little daughter's hand --- a no-no in their opinion, but necessary b/c she was still in the run-into-traffic age.
But as A. aptly notes, these guys are like the rattle-snake handling Chrisitians or the God-hate-America-because-of-fags Baptist minister.
Now now. Treating women like chattel is only frowned upon when Muslims do it. I would have sworn you received that memo.
I love the smell of puns in the morning.
I thought only Moslems behaved this way?
Who bangs whose heads against a wall?
"But as A. aptly notes, these guys are like ... the God-hates-America-because-of-fags Baptist minister."
Very apt analogy. As far as "logic" goes.
I once read that the stringencies in religion always tend to the 'man-to-G-d' side. That is that people will say more 'hail Marys' yet not so quickly give charity. Or in this case, the humiliation and physical attack on this woman was all in the name of 'modesty'.
Yes, that seems to be true in many instances.
I suppose these people are included among those who dedicate their every waking moment to insuring that they will be 'saved' and obtain favorable treatment in an after-life. As long as their selfishness doesn't harm others, one can tolerate it, I suppose; but when their selfishness motivates them to harm others, a line must be drawn and they must be stopped.
we were our orthodox friend who will push back as hard as they do. My wife did not--trying to ride busses during high holidays is difficult at best--especially trying to leave the Western Wall..
I never read my memos (which explains a lot, of course)...
Didn't they forswear belief in the afterlife?
Huh? Jews treat their wives wonderfully. Respectfully, and so on. Treating women like chattel is not the same thing as tacitly agreeing to a set-up where both sexes are seated more modestly and both sexes are more comfortable like that.
This happens to be a bus-run with a very heavily orthodox clientele. (due to the route)
That isn't to say that these zealots were correct in their reaction. Even if it was a private bus, resorting to violence was totally ridiculous.
I've been at weddings that had a tacit separate seating/dancing arrangement and would inevitably have some obnoxious 'Uncle Charlie' sitting on the women's side (in the name of equality of the sexes or what-not)
Eventually the decision is made to gently suggest that his participation is making the women uncomfortable. Then he moves or (usually) doesn't and the majority of women just ingore him.
If they didn't specify otherwise, I'd have thought this was TROP.
You are expecting sense from religious fanatics?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.