Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke Case: The Worst Worsens (Thomas Sowell)
Creator's Syndicate ^ | December 19, 2006 | Dr. Thomas Sowell

Posted on 12/18/2006 9:07:40 PM PST by RWR8189

In his book "The Great Crash 1929," John Kenneth Galbraith said: "The worst continued to worsen." The same can be said of the Duke University "rape" case and District Attorney Michael Nifong.

After all this time, it finally came out in court last week that the DNA samples collected from the underwear and private parts of the alleged victim contained DNA from other men -- but none from the Duke lacrosse players who were accused of raping her.

The head of the DNA testing laboratory testified in court under oath that both he and Nifong knew this and kept it secret.

You think that is incredible? How about a statement made afterwards by District Attorney Nifong that he didn't say anything about this publicly because he was "trying to avoid dragging any names through the mud"?

He certainly did not avoid dragging the names of the Duke lacrosse players through the mud. He not only denounced them, they were paraded in handcuffs in front of the national media. Their pictures were on every television news program across the country.

If these young men get completely exonerated, this episode will still follow them the rest of their lives. Yet they have not been convicted of anything and have not even gone to trial -- which is scheduled for next spring, if it ever takes place.

Indeed, they have not even been interviewed by the police or by the District Attorney who issued denunciations of these white lacrosse players when he was running for office and making a play for the black vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; dukerape; durhamdirtbag; nifong; sowell; thomassowell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 12/18/2006 9:07:42 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Someone needs to start a rumor that Nifong is a closet Republican. If that started he'd get crucified for what he's done. The Democrats don't care and the Republicans don't have the stones to take this guy out.


2 posted on 12/18/2006 9:14:42 PM PST by hometoroost (TSA = Thousands Standing Around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

It is unfortunate that prosectorial misconduct on this scale is not a capital crime. This DA should be put away for at least 20 years.


3 posted on 12/18/2006 9:23:09 PM PST by Agent Smith (Fallujah delenda est. (I wish))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Agent Smith
It is unfortunate that prosectorial misconduct on this scale is not a capital crime.

The law definitely needs to be changed. No one should be above the law...not judges, prosecutors, or any other law enforcement officials. Nifong has exhibited criminal behavior and should put on trial.

4 posted on 12/18/2006 9:29:55 PM PST by vox humana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Agent Smith
If this stands and the boy's are found not guilty , some tough lawyer will pierce the Vail and sue the state , and this moron personally.
5 posted on 12/18/2006 9:29:58 PM PST by fantom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189; Gordongekko909
Nifong deserves to be removed from office and disbarred.

At the very minimum!

Another great piece by Dr. Sowell. It is short and to the point but covered most everything.

6 posted on 12/18/2006 9:30:07 PM PST by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Nigong's arrogance scares me. I hope in the year 2007, three white men cannot be convicted for a crime they never committed. Will the potential black jury vote payback when it comes time for a verdict? Scary.
7 posted on 12/18/2006 9:30:28 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tioga

-that's Nifong.


8 posted on 12/18/2006 9:30:50 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

This guy needs to be recalled.

If a republican tried to prosecute INNOCENT blacks for raping a black girl and he got caught just using it to drum up votes knowingly, could you begin to imagine the sanctimony and the sh!t storm that would follow.

The news cycle would be 3 weeks minimum, forget about the war, FORGET EVERYTHING, this would be the evidence they're looking for, we would have so much introspection and navel gazing - oh, and you can forget about the "healing process"


9 posted on 12/18/2006 9:35:52 PM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost
[Someone needs to start a rumor that Nifong is a closet Republican.]



Or someone should start a rumor that his scalp is worth 50 bucks.
10 posted on 12/18/2006 9:36:07 PM PST by spinestein (There is no pile of pennies so large that I won't throw two more on top.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob

I meant innocent blacks raping a WHITE girl.


11 posted on 12/18/2006 9:36:31 PM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

My brother-in-law has a set phrase for scum like nifong : MANDATORY CASTRATION!!!


12 posted on 12/18/2006 9:38:26 PM PST by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Agent Smith
"It is unfortunate that prosectorial misconduct on this scale is not a capital crime"

Won't ever be a crime; couldn't get the likes of Tom DeLay if it were.
13 posted on 12/18/2006 9:44:17 PM PST by raftguide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
It's unfortunate that the Sowells of the world won't run for high office. Their egos don't require it. Their sense of decency doesn't want their family to be dragged through the mud by the media for every little mistake they may have made in the past. And, they make enough money to be satisfied, without resorting to the corruption to get more.

In other words, they're too damned smart.

And besides, they'd be crucified by the Mediots, for saying what they mean, and meaning what they say.

14 posted on 12/18/2006 9:44:37 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Indeed, they have not even been interviewed by the police or by the District Attorney...

Even now? Unbelievable.

God bless Tom Sowell.

15 posted on 12/18/2006 9:50:12 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

In these days of the Post-Enlightenment, when so many in the privileged Western World scorn morality, truth, liberty, and logic, we who are weary of the decadent, mendacious Left find solace in the words of a gentleman of truth, wisdom, and honor such as Thomas Sowell.


16 posted on 12/18/2006 9:51:05 PM PST by Savage Beast ("Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fantom
"...some tough lawyer will pierce the Vail..."

Veil. Pierce the veil.

Which is an odd figure of speech. Did you coin it?

Raise or draw back the veil, yes, but pierce it?

Pierce the veil...wasn't that Spinal Tap's album sequel to their smash hit with the similarly incongruous title, "Smell the glove"?

AV

17 posted on 12/18/2006 9:53:54 PM PST by Atomic Vomit (www.aroostookbeauty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Atomic Vomit
It comes from some court case involving corporations that were set up to basically commit or shield fraud.

"Piercing the corporate veil" was the terminology used in the decision.

(From an undergrad business law class I had way back when).

18 posted on 12/18/2006 10:07:48 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Atomic Vomit

Usually applies to piercing the corporate veil which means that the liability protection usually afforded to shareholders is pierced to allow lawsuits against the personal assets of shareholders. Usually happens when the shareholder is aware of the activity and/or facilitates the activity which is under litigation.


19 posted on 12/18/2006 10:08:26 PM PST by exhaustguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fantom
some tough lawyer will pierce the Vail and sue the state , and this moron personally.

A lawyer you are not.

20 posted on 12/18/2006 10:57:55 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson