"Vann hasn't gone the soapbox route. He just answers questions
about NC criminal procedure and local judicial philosophy and customs.
He's more like a reporter."
Again, Vann's father was a longtime NC legal eagle, Chesire league maybe.
Him and his son Woody tried murder cases together in Durham courts.
Vann junior has done a lot of previous legal work for Honey and her family.
His analysis has been right on the money from day one- whether you
like it or not. If the other lawyers in town hadn't pushed him aside early on
none of this would be happening today.
btt
I know his analysis has been spot on, which is why I listen to what he has to say, which is what I'm trying to get across to JLS as his current value as a commentator on the case when he goes on TV shows like Greta. Please read the entire exchange which is several posts from both of us rather than picking out a couple of sentences to respond to. Your point, which is tangential to what we're talking about, would be better made to JLS because I'm not the one with a problem with Vann. I want to hear what Vann has to say because he provides knowledge and insight into NC criminal procedure, local rules of court, and how the judiciary responds and operates. That's his value in this case at the point we've come to recently and now.