Posted on 12/18/2006 4:34:47 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
As my brother in law might say "If we Jews rule the world, where's my cut?"
The woman should be boycotted, just as Mel Gibson should have been boycotted.
You beat me to it.
Maybe we just didn't know. Someone here posted a rather nasty quote from the Peanut Farmer, so I asked him for a reference which he gave. He closed by suggesting that I "just google for 'If I get back in' and carter." (It's sort of an eye-opener.)
ML/NJ
It's becoming fashionable to be open about it.
Shameful as it is, prior to 9/11 and joining FR I held antisemitic views. Obviously I never called myself antisemitic, only "anti Israeli occupation, anti Zionist etc".
The 9/11 attacks kinda brought it all home that something stinks in the mideast and it ain't Israel.
""Does anyone have her comment on tape? Right now, it's a lawyer's word against a book publisher's (Regan). Yet everybody is assuming it's Regan who is lying.""
The title of her forthcoming book, "If I Said It."
Jewish cable? JNN headline news?
This thread is brought to you by the world-wide zionist conspiracy.
Mel Gibson, please pick up the white courtesy phone.
She should have known better. Murdoch used to be a Nazi-hunter.
Stop muddying the waters with logic and common sense.
Perhaps you should learn to use "spell check". What's your friends's name, btw?
It's been my perception of her for a long time, that she is very self absorbed and impressed with herself.
In any case I can't stand her, and suspect she and O.J. got it on. Birds of a feather.
That must be how he found "Hitler's Secret Diary."
I was about to ask the same thing. It's really alarming because I think the recent spate of comments by people in the media like Regan, Gibson (and now Novak) seem to be reflecting a more widespread acceptance of such filth.
I heard enough of this kind of trash from ignorant, foreign-born relatives: I don't need to hear more of it from Americans who really ought to know better.
How do you know she said anything anti-semitic? One guy - a lawyer for a company that she's on the outs with - makes the charge. It's in his "notes" - which implies he doesn't have a tape. She claims she said no such thing. Why and how do you know she's the one who's lying, and not the lawyer?
I love that Homer in your tagline. Did you have to screw around with the font to do that?
|
Murdock is adjusting to survive the Rodham Administration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.