["you now want to redefine what this somehow means."]
Nope, I'm not redefining anything. Like I said in my previous post, my (earlier) comment went over your head.
Now, why don't you answer my question: Can you explain to me why Carla del Ponte is appealing the TWO year sentence given to Oric by the international court? Remember, the prosecution asked that Oric get eighteen years.
Another example: http://www.un.org/icty/glance/hadzihasanovic.htm (I’ll make your case for you)
So obviously in this case, the French, Dutch, and Madagascaran, judges were bought right? They were part of a plot against the Serbs?
You guys are getting old. All you do is deny and make counter accusations, create arguments that are full of conspiracies (We already learned from one of you "experts" that the Balkan crisis was all about the oil! lol) logical fallacies and personal attacks. But no substance, none what so ever.