Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: Cheney's Gay Daughter to be 'Fine Mom'
NewsMax ^ | 12/15/2006

Posted on 12/16/2006 3:59:48 PM PST by VictoryGal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: Lando Lincoln
President Bush has an elegance to him that some on this thread will never understand.

I suspect most of the FReepers here praising Bush for his elegance and good manners support gay marriage--or are at least ambivalent about the issue.

81 posted on 12/17/2006 6:44:58 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: john_88

"Re the line: "God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done."

Doesn't this make God the author of sin? Or at least the facilitator of sin? And isn't there a conflict between this and God's holding people accountable for their actions?"

Those very good questions.

Sin is the condition that results when separated from God.

God gave humans free will to choose Him, or separation from Him. Because of free will, we choose our condition. God allows this on Earth.

Does that explanation help?


82 posted on 12/17/2006 6:50:36 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: john_88

After posting to you, I thought of a good analogy. Think God = Light.

Darkness is the absence of Light.

Those who choose darkness go through life blindly without light as a consequence.


83 posted on 12/17/2006 6:59:07 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

Suspect and judge all you want or care to.


84 posted on 12/17/2006 7:10:35 AM PST by Lando Lincoln (Democrats: The marriage of ignorance and arrogance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Thanks.

I am a struggling agnostic who's recently gone back to reading the Bible again. Try as I might, I can't find any support in the Bible for human free will. Instead, there are dozens of instances where the Bible talks about divine sovereignty and predestination - the old ( now largely ignored ) Calvinist notions of election and reprobation.

In other words, God has chosen certain people for salvation and others for damnation - and this choice has nothing to do with any foreknowledge God has about the conduct on the individual in question.

I find all this completely counter-intuitive. The only way I can make sense of it is by going back to first principles: The Bible is the word of God. The Bible says that God is good and just. It also says that God elects certain people for Heaven, others for Hell. Therefore this is a good and just thing by definition of the fact that God wills it - even if it seems "unfair" by human notions of justice.

Sorry if this doesn't make much sense, but I'm still struggling to understand it. I know that there are arguments on both sides.


85 posted on 12/17/2006 8:11:24 AM PST by john_88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Alia

That's a really great post. Food for thought :-)


86 posted on 12/17/2006 9:44:29 AM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: john_88

You're welcome. I went through an agnostic period myself, after being kicked out of the Catholic church. That's a whole other story in itself, but the Lord used that to help me find Him. After that, I, too, began to read the Bible and ran into lots of questions.

What I did, and would recommend the same for you or anyone in the seeking position, was to ask God to show me the answers. At that time I wasn't even sure he existed.

He did answer over the years, in circumstances showing me his Truths, by bringing people to me that would help me understand what He wanted me to see. For that I am very thankful. I've asked the Lord to please show you wisdom and understanding. You can't go wrong rereading the Bible, which I've discovered to be God's User Manual for our lives.

To me, our few postings are God's way of pointing me to something He wants me to learn. I have never thought about the questions you bring up in your last post to me--so a heartfelt thanks to you. I'm no biblical scholar, but did come up with some searches that are along those lines that you may be interested in reading. I will be reading them, too. If you find anything else that might be good, too, please pass them on.

http://www.christiananswers.net/q-acb/acb-t008.html
What does the Bible say about God's sovereignty, election, predestination, and man's free will?

http://www.theopedia.com/Free_will
Free Will - Probably the most common definition of free will is the "ability to make choices without any prior prejudice, inclination, or disposition,"1 and specifically that these "free will" choices are not ultimately predestined by God. "

http://www.biblelife.org/election.htm
God's Election and Man's Free Will!

http://www.jesussaidfollowme.org/calvinismarminianism.htm?gclid=CPrNh9yFmokCFREXEAodSUxrNg
"Calvinism, Arminianism, & Creditism?"

http://members.tripod.com/carla_b/realfacts/free_will.html
DOES THE BIBLE TEACH FREE WILL?

http://home.rochester.rr.com/matthewl/predestination/
PREDESTINATION OR FREE WILL

http://www.carm.org/open/free_will.htm
Open Theism and Libertarian Free Will

http://www.seekerstrove.com/predestination.html
Predestination

http://experts.about.com/q/Bible-Studies-1654/Free-vs-fate.htm
According to Christianity, does God control our future and every action we make through fate, or is there a mix of free will?

http://www.studybibleforum.com/spages/Predestination%20free%20will.htm
Was Pharaoh responsible?

I've also found Come Reason Ministries a good place for questions in the past:
http://www.googlesyndicatedsearch.com/u/comereason?q=free+will&sa=Search&sp-a=sp10010bee&sp-p=any&sp-f=iso-8859-1
FREE WILL


87 posted on 12/17/2006 10:34:49 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: onyx

How can a lesbian be a "fine mom"? No matter what else she does, she has denied her child a father and engaged in a deviant and sinful lifestyle in plain sight of her child.

I think the bets thing would be to say "I wish the best for this child," and say nothing about the "parents."


88 posted on 12/17/2006 10:59:24 AM PST by TraditionalistMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Thank you so much.

I'll read all the material you posted, and will pass it on to people I know who are in the same boat.

I've had many long Arminianism vs Calvinism discussions with people in the past, and your material addresses many of the controversies.

Much appreciated. Hope to talk with you again soon.

John x


89 posted on 12/17/2006 11:40:40 AM PST by john_88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
This, as you describe is the role of a priest/minister --"hate the sin/love the sinner" -- NOT a President.

Unless he makes the effort to place his personal comments in context,

So, he should have a daily dairy upon which he clarifies every word he ever utters, eh?

the clear implication is that his views have somehow evolved and he now fully accepts and even celebrates these corrosive frauds on traditional marriage.

How is it that I can still recall his positions of years back, hear his well wishes for Mary Cheney, and suffer absolutely no confusion, conflict, or misunderstanding of his clarity -- but you cannot. Is it that you choose to behave this way?

90 posted on 12/17/2006 1:54:00 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: TraditionalistMommy

"How can a lesbian be a "fine mom"? No matter what else she does, she has denied her child a father and engaged in a deviant and sinful lifestyle in plain sight of her child."

That stuff doesn't matter to the neocons. They're afraid the republicans will lose votes and be tainted as "moralists".

We have to approve of immoral behavior to be accepted with our own party now. (Or what used to be "the party").


91 posted on 12/17/2006 2:01:21 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

Far from being a "fine mom," Mary Cheney is behaving on the level of an animal being bred for its offspring, so she and her partner in delusion can selfishly continue playing "pretend family."


92 posted on 12/17/2006 2:35:16 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john_88

You're welcome John x. And thanks to you, too. I'm reading the posts, now. Write anytime and Merry Christmas!


93 posted on 12/17/2006 2:36:56 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

What does anyone expect him to say publicly? He's too much of a gentleman to excoriate her and her 'partner' in a public manner, even if he did feel they were wrong in their choice.


94 posted on 12/17/2006 2:45:44 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TraditionalistMommy

"I think the bets thing would be to say "I wish the best for this child," and say nothing about the "parents."

I agree with you totally on that. That would have been the best statement.


95 posted on 12/17/2006 3:02:56 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Despite what the libtards constantly say, Bush is actually the most gay friendly Republican President or Republican Presidential candidate. The only thing he doesn't want is gay marriage, but as usual, for libs that makes him no different than Jerry Falwell or that 'God Hates Fags' guy in Kansas. Dick Cheney has always been even more gay friendly.


96 posted on 12/17/2006 3:10:08 PM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

His efforts to "reach out" to Log Cabin Republicans was not lost on me.


97 posted on 12/17/2006 3:15:48 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Despite what the libtards constantly say, Bush is actually the most gay friendly Republican President or Republican Presidential candidate. The only thing he doesn't want is gay marriage, but as usual, for libs that makes him no different than Jerry Falwell or that 'God Hates Fags' guy in Kansas. Dick Cheney has always been even more gay friendly.


98 posted on 12/17/2006 3:27:39 PM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: jdm
You have to admit, it was kind of crazy-funny in that ridiculous hyperbole-of-the-week, over-the-top sort-of bizarre way.

I wanted to admit that in real life I don't really think President Bush is a latent homosexual, nor do I have anything against Vice President Cheney, nor do I really think that about Onyx, nor would I say anything like that face-to-face. But some people in their unfailing loyalty to a political figure/party sure go out of their way to solicit hyperbolic remarks like mine, however.

99 posted on 12/18/2006 11:22:14 AM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
But some people in their unfailing loyalty to a political figure/party sure go out of their way to solicit hyperbolic remarks like mine, however.

You admit you are a puppet. Your behavior is not your responsibility. fnord

100 posted on 12/20/2006 11:14:25 PM PST by John David Stutts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson