Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

David Limbaugh: Unauthorized diplomacy – where's the outrage?
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 12/16/06 | David Limbaugh

Posted on 12/16/2006 12:26:58 AM PST by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: unixfox

I'd vote for you... but you would fail to eliminate the IRS.

LLS


21 posted on 12/16/2006 7:09:45 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

After Chris Dodd and Bianca Jagger went to Nicaragua to negotiate a separate peace with dictator Daniel Noriega and our government refused to do anything, why are we surprised Democrats are negotiating with the enemy again?


22 posted on 12/16/2006 7:34:26 AM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

you're saying that have an angle?


23 posted on 12/16/2006 7:35:08 AM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1754263/posts

Great minds think alike?


24 posted on 12/16/2006 7:36:29 AM PST by upchuck (What's done is done. And if we don't get our stuff together, it'll be done to us again in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

I may be wrong but I believe there is a law called the Sullivan Act that forbids private citizens from engaging in personal diplomacy. I heard about it here on FR years ago when Jesse Jackson made one of his periodic grandstanding plays for media attention. Jackson obtainied the release of captive American service members in Yugoslavia or interfered in an African civil war at the behest of well heeled business associates.
House or Senate members may not strictly speaking be private citizens but neither are they accredited diplomatic representatives. Unless aent as informal envoys of the President they lack official standing to conduct the diplomacy of the United States.
The failure of the executive branch departments of State and Justice to act by seizing the passports of those involved (preventing travel) or prosecuting them on their return only serves to encourage this kind of thing.


25 posted on 12/16/2006 9:33:11 AM PST by skepsel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Check on something called the Logan Act


26 posted on 12/16/2006 9:40:19 AM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skepsel

Check the Logan Act


27 posted on 12/16/2006 9:43:13 AM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: skepsel
The failure of the executive branch departments of State and Justice to act by seizing the passports of those involved (preventing travel) or prosecuting them on their return only serves to encourage this kind of thing.
This is Bush's Achille's Heel. Terminal inability to take any action against domestic traitors.
28 posted on 12/16/2006 9:45:06 AM PST by samtheman (The Democrats are the DhimmiGods of the New Religion of PC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: skepsel
What we need is the President to use his Bully Pulpit to bring this sediton to the attention of the American Public -- like in the speech he intends to make to America about the WOT.

I was stunned last night to hear his approval rating is now in the 20's? I suspect someone in the WH has things mixed up and thinks we don't want him to fight back against these ba$tards when, in fact, the opposite is true and if he did (fight bact) his ratings would soar.

29 posted on 12/16/2006 9:52:44 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

30 posted on 12/16/2006 9:56:38 AM PST by Gritty (The war in Iraq is not the war on terror. The war in Afghanistan was. - Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

darn! You're right of course, the Logan Act, for some reason I thought it was the Sullivan Act (NY or NYC law re: firearms rights).


31 posted on 12/16/2006 10:37:59 AM PST by skepsel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: river rat

I really wonder why Bush has let them do this?


32 posted on 12/16/2006 5:07:47 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson