Which means Massachussetts could have only one Senator till an election is held. It looks like this is constitutional under the 17th amendment, but it's stupid.
Amendment XVII
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.
This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.
"Which means Massachussetts could have only one Senator till an election is held."
Massachusetts won't even have one senator, if John Kerry is still following the schedule he followed a couple of years back--absent from Capitol Hill as much as 7/8 of the time.