Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Stealth Fighter Completes First Flight
Lockheed Corporate Website ^ | 12/15/2006 | Lockheed Press Release

Posted on 12/15/2006 1:28:50 PM PST by Kommodor

FORT WORTH, Texas, Dec. 15, 2006 – The Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] F-35 Lightning II lifted into the skies today for the first time, completing a successful inaugural flight and initiating the most comprehensive flight test program in military aviation history.

“The Lightning II performed beautifully,” said F-35 Chief Pilot Jon Beesley following the flight. “What a great start for the flight-test program, and a testimony to the people who have worked so hard to make this happen.” The most powerful engine ever placed in a fighter aircraft – the Pratt & Whitney F135 turbofan, with 40,000 pounds of thrust – effortlessly pushed the F-35 skyward. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at lockheedmartin.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f35; fighter; lightning; lockheed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Cool beans. It's a bit boxy, but I'd sure love to fly one...
1 posted on 12/15/2006 1:28:53 PM PST by Kommodor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kommodor

Its boxy so they can hide the armaments inside...less radar detection...


2 posted on 12/15/2006 1:30:15 PM PST by Youngman442002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor

The Announcements sidebar is reserved for FR business.

Not this.

AM


3 posted on 12/15/2006 1:31:36 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor

Hasn't the VTOL version already flown? I could have sworn I saw something on that on tv. Nice plane, regardless.


4 posted on 12/15/2006 1:32:20 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor

Can't wait to hear the results of war games with the F-22.


5 posted on 12/15/2006 1:32:58 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor

WHAT!? No PICTURES?
LOL


6 posted on 12/15/2006 1:33:41 PM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://realitycheck.blogsome.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
7 posted on 12/15/2006 1:36:37 PM PST by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor

If I had the choice between winning the lottery and being a fighter pilot, I think I would choose fighter pilot.


8 posted on 12/15/2006 1:37:53 PM PST by T.Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

That was a prototype. This one is apparently the first production version - still needs testing and probably tweaks, but because it will be fully equipped, is basically the same as what will go into service.


9 posted on 12/15/2006 1:39:06 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

That was the pre-production prototype. This is the first production aircraft.


10 posted on 12/15/2006 1:39:39 PM PST by Phlyer (Poster since 2000, I just changed my screen name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
"Hasn't the VTOL version already flown? I could have sworn I saw something on that on tv. Nice plane, regardless."

That was just a test version. Really just an X-plane. This was a production aircraft off the manufacturing line.

11 posted on 12/15/2006 1:39:59 PM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper; Phlyer; buwaya
Perhaps we should all try that together in harmony!    ; )
12 posted on 12/15/2006 1:41:58 PM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper

Yah, in fact it was more of a Y- version then an X plane


13 posted on 12/15/2006 1:42:34 PM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog

All I know is I would have LOVED to have seen this blast off...40K of thrust - ROARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!


14 posted on 12/15/2006 1:53:39 PM PST by Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor

The keyword "AEROSPACE" has been added to your post.


15 posted on 12/15/2006 1:54:34 PM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

That was the X-35 prototype. This is first flight of the production F-35, and even so it is a "pre-production" version.

The production F-35B STOVL has not yet flown.


16 posted on 12/15/2006 1:55:47 PM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor
FIRST F-35 NEARS COMPLETION AT LOCKHEED MARTIN

17 posted on 12/15/2006 2:00:03 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (We are but Seekers of Truth, not the Source.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Ah, sorry, I saw announcements, and thought "corporate announcement ..." Seemed appropriate.

Anyway, I know the good stuff goes inside.

I just still think the F-16 has classier lines. Having all the weapons on the inside may make good sense, but ...

It's not the most aesthetically appealing solution.

:)


18 posted on 12/15/2006 2:00:20 PM PST by Kommodor (Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Short video clip of the X-35 STOVL Prototype here.
19 posted on 12/15/2006 2:00:58 PM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kommodor
This is a beautiful airplane with impressive capability. However, it will be totally irrelevant, until the marxist under belly of our nation is eradicated.
20 posted on 12/15/2006 2:02:46 PM PST by A6M3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson