Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol

There are much better yields from other algae diesel technologies, in the order of 10-15k gallons per acre per year, and that's just to start......


13 posted on 12/15/2006 11:59:32 AM PST by Red Badger (New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


So the production equipment costs $60k for an acre, and by their estimates an acre could produce about 6,000 gallons of diesel per year. That is $10/gallon for a year, or $1/gallon even spread over 10 years. That is just the cost of the reactor. Add in maintenance, overhead, labor, transportation, and there is no way, even over 20 years that it could cost-efficient.


15 posted on 12/15/2006 12:05:58 PM PST by wacko rightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
I had not heard of those. Do you have any references you can point me to? 15 to 16 thousand per year per acre would make the technology almost efficient enough to start to replace gasoline production... assuming a 40 mpg plus diesel vehicle was the standard.

It might even be possible to go back and revisit some of the steam car, external combustion engines to boost the mpg even further.
16 posted on 12/15/2006 12:09:05 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson