Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Russia to Refit Nuclear Missiles
Las Vegas Sun ^ | December 15, 2006 at 7:25:11 PST | VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 12/15/2006 9:29:05 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

MOSCOW (AP) - Russia will replace single nuclear warheads on some of its strategic missiles with multiple warheads, Russian news agencies reported Friday, allowing Moscow to modernize its nuclear arsenal while building fewer new missiles - and spending less.

In theory, the shift would also make it easier for Russian nuclear weapons to evade a U.S. missile defense system.

"In the near future we will begin to substitute the single warheads on Topol-M intercontinental missiles with multiple warheads," the Interfax-Military News Agency quoted Gen. Nikolai Solovtsov, commander of Russia's Strategic Rocket Forces, as saying Friday.

"This makes the task of replacing aging missiles much easier," said Alexander Pikayev, a Moscow-based defense analyst who is co-chair of the Committee of Scientists for Global Security.

On Thursday, President Vladimir Putin said the deployment of Topol-M missiles on mobile launchers was a "serious step forward in strengthening Russia's defense capability."

Capable of hitting targets more than 6,000 miles away, the Topol-M missiles have so far been deployed only in silos. The mobile version of the missile, mounted on an off-road vehicle, is harder to locate and destroy.

The United States has not deployed similar mobile launch systems, but it has better access to oceans and can concentrate its nuclear missiles in submarines, Pikayev said.

Johns Isaacs, executive director of the Council for a Livable World in Washington, said Friday that the deployment would not change the strategic balance between Russian and U.S. nuclear arsenals.

"It's a reflection that the Russians as well as the Americans continue to update their forces with weapons they won't use and don't need," Isaacs said. "Adding a few more here or there is not going to make any difference in the balance of power, the state of the world, peace on earth, or good will toward men."

During the economic shocks of the 1990s, Russia was slow to modernize its nuclear weapons systems.

The military has commissioned just over 40 of the Topol-M missiles since 1997, and aging Soviet-era missiles form the backbone of the nation's nuclear capability.

In 2002, Putin and President Bush signed a treaty obliging both sides to cut the number of strategic nuclear weapons by about two-thirds by 2012, down to between 1,700 and 2,200 missiles each.

When the treaty was signed, many analysts said the number of Russian nuclear weapons could fall far below the number set by the treaty.

However, the recent oil boom allowed the Kremlin to increase military spending and speed modernization.

---

Associated Press writer Judith Ingram contributed to this story.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coldwar2; mirv; nukes; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Calling Dr. Strangelove.. they're at it again.


41 posted on 12/16/2006 10:56:29 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Sorry about the double posting, I must have hit the button twice.


42 posted on 12/16/2006 10:58:57 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

YEAH thats clearly a violation of the start treaty. Well that’s a good idea to update the minuteman ICBM force to MIRV status and it would be better. Even so if the United States doesn’t then, they should reactivate the Peacekeeper ICBM missile on the grounds that russia has probably more then 500 Minuteman III ICBM’S then the U.S not to mention they have mobile ICBM’S which in the event of war would be much harder ro locate and destroy in the event of war.


43 posted on 03/25/2008 9:22:37 AM PDT by Black_Cell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
the mobiles were active several years ago

They were developed and several built for the military parades but few or none were operationally deployed.

44 posted on 03/25/2008 9:26:19 AM PDT by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

The mobile ones were allowed and were developed together with truck launchers but were not deployed due to Russia being in a state of no money.


46 posted on 03/25/2008 10:25:57 AM PDT by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

Yes, everything is being fueled up and put on patrol now that they can afford to pay the crews. Flying museum pieces and all.


48 posted on 03/25/2008 10:32:10 AM PDT by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Aaron0617
FYI

also that Obama wants to cease all weapons testing and nuclear defense testing. and wants to reduce nuclear arsenal.

49 posted on 03/25/2008 10:35:43 AM PDT by Aaron0617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson