Replies

McVeigh is all you have as evidence of non-Muslim terrorism here.

No. Just the most well-known.

He adheres to an ideology that seeks to overthrow the Constitution.

I'll ask again: When did Kareem Abdul-Jabbar declare war on America?

What a morally bankrupt comparison.

It's pretty apt. The hissing disgust you typed into that word is almost audible. Perhaps you've never had to deal with anti-Semitism spat in your ear as you walk down the street, but I have. And, EPWR? It sounded just like your posts.

. No, I call you Muslim because I believe you are one.

You've already proven your willingness to take losing bets. Now you're showing that you don't even bother to read a man's posting history before you tar him with what you consider to be insults.

"No. Just the most well-known. "

More like all you have.

"l ask again: When did Kareem Abdul-Jabbar declare war on America? "

When he converted to the ideology of the enemy of his country.

"It's pretty apt. "

It isn't apt at all.

"The hissing disgust you typed into that word is almost audible. "

I have contempt for those who hold themselves to the ideology of Islam just as I have contempt for those who followed Hitler. THAT is what YOU defend here. You defend the original national socialism.

"Perhaps you've never had to deal with anti-Semitism spat in your ear as you walk down the street, but I have. And, EPWR? It sounded just like your posts."

Most "anti-Semitism" derives from the Middle East and Islam.

"Now you're showing that you don't even bother to read a man's posting history before you tar him with what you consider to be insults."

I've read enough, zimdog. You defend the indefensible. You defend evil with the tactics of the Left. Interesting you post here, isn't it?

Perhaps you've never had to deal with anti-Semitism spat in your ear as you walk down the street, but I have.

Given the flippancy with which he dismisses Mufti Husseini and all the mahometan SS troops, I suspect he's done more than his fair share of the spatting he talks of. So of course he's heard it.

Now you're showing that you don't even bother to read a man's posting history before you tar him with what you consider to be insults.

A glimpse at your posting history here reveals that you post virtually nothing overtly supportive of this forum's conservative purposes or beliefs. Rather, you linger on the backchannel threads making snide, venom-laced comments to other freepers who do actually support this forum's conservative purposes and beliefs.

The single dominant and unifying characteristic of your comments is the context in which they are posted, which is almost always either a defense of mahometan theology or a tu quoque smear against western civilization made in response to a criticism of mahometan theology.

That is why I referred to you as a disruptive troll. It is also why I remain suspicious of your motives here, and why others such as EPWR are similarly suspicious. Posting on a conservative forum does not make you a conservative. You have to show that through content, and the content of your posting history is generally lacking in genuine conservatism.