Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deputy's murder charge dismissed in PlayStation case
CNN ^ | 12-13-06 | AP

Posted on 12/13/2006 6:29:36 AM PST by VRing

RALEIGH, North Carolina (AP) -- A murder charge was dismissed Tuesday against a sheriff's deputy accused of shooting an unarmed teenager after a grand jury foreman said he had checked the wrong box on the indictment paperwork.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: 2setsoflaws; abovethelaw; christopherlong; donutwatch; jbt; murder; oops; peytonstrickland; playstationcase
Wonder how the cops got the Grand jury to change their mind. I've never heard of such a thing.
1 posted on 12/13/2006 6:29:40 AM PST by VRing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VRing

the fix is in


2 posted on 12/13/2006 6:35:43 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRing
    Sheriff:  "Say, what's your address again?"
Foreman:  "Uh, hold on..." (erasing sounds)
    Sheriff:  "Don't tear the paper, boy..."
3 posted on 12/13/2006 6:38:46 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRing
The whole story sounds like...


4 posted on 12/13/2006 6:39:47 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRing
Oh what a beautiful system! So very constitutional.

Everyone deserves a slimy lawyer, selective evidence, governement morons, and a bunch of jurors from the randomized cesspool that is "the masses".

That's "justice". Seek your own, and they will put you in jail faster than a real criminal.

5 posted on 12/13/2006 6:41:41 AM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

They say they can indict a ham sandwich, I see the error.


6 posted on 12/13/2006 6:53:38 AM PST by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
The foreman of the grand jury must be some kind of a real dumbass. He should have made certain his check was done properly, as his stupidity caused a lot of anger and unnecessary angst for all concerned. The clown must have had a hot date or something to screw up totally.
7 posted on 12/13/2006 7:07:11 AM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer

"He should have made certain his check was done properly, as his stupidity caused a lot of anger and unnecessary angst for all concerned."

Are you actually falling for this "I made a mistake" BS?


8 posted on 12/13/2006 7:09:04 AM PST by VRing (Happiness is a perfect sling bruise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer
New Hanover County is not famous for it's best and brightest, a Yankee take over. We have a lady of color who sues the city for 15 mil and runs for city council president, (lost) which she once held. Belongs in the Oaks, sanitarium for the mentally ill.
9 posted on 12/13/2006 7:17:54 AM PST by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VRing

I'm not falling for anything here. If tat's what happened, the the foreman is a total whack job. If not, then the "fix" is in, and in this part of the country I'm not certain of anything either. That answer your question?


10 posted on 12/13/2006 7:52:34 AM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VRing

Reading the article sounds different from the headline. It's not completely clear, but it sounds like the jury decided NOT to pursue charges, but the foreman made ambiguous marks on the form that made the authorities initially announce there *were* charges, only to retract that when the error came out.


11 posted on 12/13/2006 8:02:53 AM PST by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRing
My favorite line:
"He based his decision on his law enforcement training," McGuinness said Tuesday. "The fact that he shot was not a mistake. It was based on his belief that he was being fired upon."

Okay, the SHOT was not a mistake. the REASON for the shot was a mistake. I feel so much better now that that's been made clear.

I'm not going to pillory the deputy, at least not all by himself. Clearly the training was inadequate, and that's not his fault. Clearly the decision to deply the "elite" group was, at best, questionable, and that's not his fault. Whatever blame there is can be shared around, not just focussed on this guy.

The evidence free allegation that the Grand Jury changed their minds under pressure from the sheriff is also weakened by the firing of the deputy. The sheriff isn't backing this guy up. My guess is that the Sheriff would prefer to have the deputy take the blame than have the enquiry go where it should, namely into the decision to deploy the dunamic entry team and the training of that team.

12 posted on 12/13/2006 8:16:56 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Now we are all Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

"weakened by the firing of the deputy."

How long do you think he'll stay fired?


13 posted on 12/13/2006 8:56:52 AM PST by VRing (Happiness is a perfect sling bruise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VRing
How long do you think he'll stay fired?

He MIGHT vcould get a job in some other PD or SO, but I htink he's toast. Sheriff is an elected office and whatever the morality of the situation might be, the sheriff isn't going to let himself be tarred with that brush.

14 posted on 12/13/2006 9:12:31 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Now we are all Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VRing

"Wonder how the cops got the Grand jury to change their mind. I've never heard of such a thing."

How, exactly did you arrive at that conclusion when the news report states that the grand jury foreman checked the wrong box?


15 posted on 12/13/2006 3:08:52 PM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson