Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shrinkermd
This word is of much more recent origin and at the time this book was written the concept of homosexual vs. heterosexual was not used.
 
Oh??
 

 

"Homosexuality," Plato wrote, "is regarded as shameful by barbarians and by those who live under despotic governments just as philosophy is regarded as shameful by them, because it is apparently not in the interest of such rulers to have great ideas engendered in their subjects, or powerful friendships or passionate love-all of which homosexuality is particularly apt to produce." This attitude of Plato's was characteristic of the ancient world...

 

 

 

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/pwh/1979boswell.html

 
 

63 posted on 12/14/2006 5:42:46 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie
Your author misquotes Plato. This has been a constant problem for people quoting Plato. What they are quoting is below:

"In his Symposium the ancient Greek philosopher Plato described three sexual orientations (through the character of the profane comedian Aristophanes) and provided explanations for their existence using an invented creation myth. [1] Aristophanes' fable is only one of many perspectives on love in the Symposium, and should not be considered identical with Plato's own ideas. Most of the Symposium's speeches are intended to be flawed in different ways, with the wise Socrates coming in at the end to correct their errors.

If you want an education rather than a means of affirming your a priori beliefs it would be wise to read Answers.Com entry on this subject which can be found here: http://www.answers.com/topic/terminology-of-homosexuality.

Incidentally, Foucault, a homosexual and an atheist, nailed the problem for Christians here:

...Post structuralist theorist Michel Foucault has argued that homosexual and heterosexual identities didn't emerge until the 19th century; before that time terms described practices and not identity. Foucault cites "Westphal's famous article of 1870 on 'contrary sexual sensations'" as the "date of birth" of the categorization of the homosexual (Foucault 1976). The point here is Christians condemn the sin but do not reject the sinner as beyond redemption. Just read any FR post on homosexuality and you find a hatred and rage that makes Hamlet's death wish seem like the chuckle of a freckle faced boy.

God knows everyone and uses everyone to make his point--even people identified as "homosexuals."

70 posted on 12/14/2006 6:38:29 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson