Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RussP

Newton was also a fervent alchemist and spent virtually his whole career after the Principea seeking the "Philosophik Mercury" and trying to turn lead into gold.

He was also (by all reports) a jerk who kept his mathematical discoveries secret for decades before being forced to publish them when another scientist (Liebniz) was closing in on developing calculus seperately.

The fact that Newton was "in awe of the Creator" is an argument from authority (which Newton actually isn't in this case) and is a logical fallacy.

It's essentially the same argument as those who point to the reports of Darwin recanting on his deathbed as disproving evolution. (he didn't, and even if he did, it wouldn't prove or disprove a thing.)


219 posted on 12/15/2006 8:04:40 PM PST by 49th (Freedom is the distance between Church and State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: 49th

"Newton was also a fervent alchemist and spent virtually his whole career after the Principea seeking the "Philosophik Mercury" and trying to turn lead into gold."

The way you state this makes it clear that you don't have a clue about how scientific discoveries are made. You sneer at Newton because we know now that lead can't be turned into gold, but Newton was doing the chemical research of his day. No, he wasn't as successful at chemistry as he was at physics, but considering that he is the greatest physicist of all time, I'll give him a break.

As for argument from authority, you missed the point. I never said that anyone should believe in ID because Newton did, but I meant that you should try to understand *why* Newton believed in ID and said so in no uncertain terms. So did Pascal, Pasteur, Maxwell, Henry, Kelvin, and Faraday, by the way, most of whom lived *after* Darwin's theory was well known. Recognize any of those names, genius? I suppose they are all "IDiots," eh?


222 posted on 12/15/2006 9:46:50 PM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: 49th; RussP
The fact that Newton was "in awe of the Creator" is an argument from authority (which Newton actually isn't in this case) and is a logical fallacy.

And when evos can't win an argument any other way, everything becomes a *logical fallacy*.

224 posted on 12/16/2006 5:32:34 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: 49th; RussP; RunningWolf
49th: He was also (by all reports) a jerk ....

RussP: Most modern evolutionists don't have a clue about the history of science, and they routinely piss on the legacy they inherited from.

And here we have a prime example.

225 posted on 12/16/2006 5:36:31 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: 49th
Newton was also a fervent alchemist and spent virtually his whole career after the Principea seeking the "Philosophik Mercury" and trying to turn lead into gold.

There are lots of folks that, if you don't give up the gold, will give you lead!!!

235 posted on 01/16/2007 9:55:26 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson