Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Taliban regrouping in Pakistan (Pakistan "allowing" Taliban to establish 'mini-state')
AP on Yahoo ^ | 12/11/06 | Matthew Pennington - ap

Posted on 12/11/2006 1:49:00 PM PST by NormsRevenge

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - A peace deal between Pakistan's government and Islamic militants in the northwestern tribal region of North Waziristan has created a virtual Taliban mini-state where mullahs dispense justice and fighters are launching cross-border attacks into neighboring Afghanistan, a think tank reported Monday.

The U.S. military confirmed that attacks have risen sharply since the deal was reached earlier this year despite concerns it would give a freer hand to Taliban and al-Qaida-linked militants who fled to Pakistan after the fall of the hard-line regime in Afghanistan in 2001.

"Over the past five years, the (President Gen. Pervez) Musharraf government has tried first brute force, then appeasement. Both have failed," said Samina Ahmed of the International Crisis Group that published the report. "Islamabad's tactics have only emboldened the pro-Taliban militants."

That grim assessment came against the backdrop of an alarming surge in violence in southern and eastern Afghanistan this year that has killed close to 4,000 people, threatening the Western-backed project to rebuild the country and establish democracy.

Government policy has allowed militants "to establish a virtual mini-Taliban-style state," the Crisis Group said, citing reports of pro-Taliban militants attacking music, video and CD stores, closing barber shops, imposing taxes and establishing courts to impose summary justice.

The Pakistani government rejected the Brussels-based group's report as "baseless allegations" and described the violence across the border as Afghanistan's internal problem.

"There are no camps or centers where terrorists are being trained in the tribal areas," said Arbab Mohammed Arif Khan, secretary for law and order in Pakistan's semiautonomous tribal regions.

Pakistan, a key U.S. anti-terror ally, has deployed about 80,000 forces at the Afghan border and launched numerous military operations against al-Qaida-linked militants in the past five years, but with mixed results. In North Waziristan, heavy-handed offensives this year left hundreds dead and stoked local anger and support for pro-Taliban religious leaders.

The peace deal, inked in September after a June cease-fire, capped the fighting in Pakistan. But the Crisis Group reported "increasingly severe cross-border attacks on Afghan and international military personnel, with the support and active involvement of Pakistani militants." It said the ambivalent approach of the Musharraf government was "destabilizing Afghanistan."

A senior tribal elder confirmed the Taliban had gained sway in North Waziristan. Tribesmen were bypassing the government and traditional tribal leaders and approaching their pro-Taliban leaders in the towns of Miran Shah and Mir Ali to settle land and money disputes. Religious students were even helping to direct traffic, he told The Associated Press.

The elder requested anonymity because he had been threatened by militants for meeting government leaders.

Access to the heavily Pashtun tribal regions, a possible hiding place for Osama bin Laden, is restricted. Foreign journalists are not permitted there unless under government or army escort, and reports of militant activities are often difficult to verify.

In Afghanistan, U.S. military spokesman Lt. Col. Paul Fitzpatrick said U.S. and Afghan security posts along the eastern border with Pakistan had seen a spike in attacks from 17 in May to 50 in August and 57 in October. Most of the attacks were in Paktika province, which lies opposite North and South Waziristan.

Attacks leveled off to about one a day in November, possibly because of winter weather settling in, Fitzpatrick said.

He said the data were not conclusive but that the increase could have been influenced by the North Waziristan peace deal or by U.S. military operations forcing more militants to operate close to the Pakistan border.

___

Associated Press writers Jason Straziuso in Kabul, Afghanistan, and Riaz Khan in Peshawar, Pakistan, contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: india; ministate; pakistan; regrouping; report; southeastasia; taliban; waziristan

1 posted on 12/11/2006 1:49:05 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

There was article in NY TImes on this. Imagine if Musharraf ceded this territory to Afghanistan--then we could invade it.


2 posted on 12/11/2006 1:51:00 PM PST by brooklyn dave (Dhimmis better not be Dhummis!!!!------or else!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brooklyn dave

Since this is now effectively a mini state no longer under the jurisdiction of Pakistan we can invade it and should.


3 posted on 12/11/2006 1:54:50 PM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Mini-state, huh? Then we should be able to take it out with just one bomb.


4 posted on 12/11/2006 2:05:00 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
I agree. Musharraf should wash his hands of this state. They shouldn't benefit from the deal we have with Musharraf not to attack into Pakistan if they won't subject themselves to the authority of Musharraf's government.
5 posted on 12/11/2006 2:05:13 PM PST by Gator101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gator101

. Musharraf should wash his hands of this state.

I kind of think that's the whole point. Musharraf has given us the go ahead by disassociating Pakistan from the region in question.


6 posted on 12/11/2006 2:08:57 PM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Sounds like the new MOAB testing grounds.


7 posted on 12/11/2006 2:22:28 PM PST by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gator101

If Musharraf's government isn't there, they won't know if we went in there or not. If he should find out, he can be "Shocked, shocked" to discover we did, and we can blame a faulty GPS unit and apologize.


8 posted on 12/11/2006 2:30:16 PM PST by wolfpat (To connect the dots, you have to collect the dots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: saganite
I kind of think that's the whole point. Musharraf has given us the go ahead by disassociating Pakistan from the region in question.

That's exactly what he has not done, and that is the problem - Musharraf has created a safe harbor for the Taliban to grow and retake Afghanistan. Any open US operations in Waziristan will result in immediate denunciations by Musharraf, and an end to cooperation with the US. Military and financial aid are all very well, but Pakistan's dictator would be overthrown and hanged by his own officers if he allowed the US to invade any part of Pakistan, and he knows it.
9 posted on 12/11/2006 2:34:06 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: saganite
I kind of think that's the whole point. Musharraf has given us the go ahead by disassociating Pakistan from the region in question.

Interesting scenario
10 posted on 12/11/2006 2:38:14 PM PST by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

....and this is news?


This has been the nature of Pak for some time now.


11 posted on 12/11/2006 2:38:41 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Once they cross the border thay are Open Season

If we are able to know the exact routes


12 posted on 12/11/2006 2:40:51 PM PST by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
citing reports of pro-Taliban militants attacking music, video and CD stores, closing barber shops, imposing taxes and establishing courts to impose summary justice.

Kind of hard to believe the Paky Army really wants to live like this and is sympathetic to these nuts
13 posted on 12/11/2006 2:42:50 PM PST by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
...fighters are launching cross-border attacks into neighboring Afghanistan

Looks like some minefields are needed here.

Mine the border except for the most well-travelled roads and paths, then set up bases and observation points to cover those.

14 posted on 12/11/2006 2:50:07 PM PST by Max in Utah (WWBFD? "What Would Ben Franklin Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

There's gambling here? HAHAHA!

>>There are no camps or centers where terrorists are being trained in the tribal areas,"

Of course not.

They are in Pakistani Kashmir.

And on Pakistani Army military bases.

Send us more money, sez Musharraf.


15 posted on 12/11/2006 2:52:25 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: The Pastor

Ah! Someone finally got it right!


17 posted on 12/11/2006 5:08:45 PM PST by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; All

http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/2006/12/bourbon-kings-remembered-everything.html


18 posted on 12/12/2006 1:35:21 PM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson