Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Small Nuclear War Would Cause Global Environmental Catastrophe (Treehugger Alert)
LiveScience ^ | Dec 11, 2006 | Jeanna Bryner

Posted on 12/11/2006 12:03:29 PM PST by TheTruthAintPretty

SAN FRANCISCO—A small-scale, regional nuclear war could disrupt the global climate for a decade or more, with environmental effects that could be devastating for everyone on Earth, researchers have concluded.

[snip]

The lingering effects could re-shape the environment in ways never conceived. In terms of climate, a nuclear blast could plunge temperatures across large swaths of the globe. "It would be the largest climate change in recorded human history," Alan Robock, associate director of the Center for Environmental Prediction at Rutgers' Cook College and another member of the research team.

[snip]

They discovered the smoke emissions would plunge temperatures by about 2 degrees Fahrenheit (1.25 degrees Celsius) over large areas of North America and Eurasia—areas far removed from the countries involved in the conflict.

(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: algore; chickenlittle; enviromentalist; environment; globalcooling; globalwarming; junkscience; mecca; proliferation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
The sky is falling!

So, we can cure global warming AND (quickly, cheaply) rid the world from a billion followers of the false prophet? What is the downside?

1 posted on 12/11/2006 12:03:30 PM PST by TheTruthAintPretty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty

Unless the war was with the SF city council......


2 posted on 12/11/2006 12:07:37 PM PST by Ben Mugged (Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty

At least they are talking about the only real threat to human life on the planet, not the exhaust from an internal combustion engine.


3 posted on 12/11/2006 12:07:47 PM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (All the horns of the wicked also will I cut off; but the horns of the righteous shall be exalted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty

By most accounts this is true. Look at the impact of Chernobyl.


4 posted on 12/11/2006 12:09:43 PM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty

"Setting off a Hiroshima-size weapon could cause as many direct fatalities as all of World War II."


OK. So why didn't that happen last time?

Do these people think that EVERONE is stupid but them?


5 posted on 12/11/2006 12:09:44 PM PST by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty

This is bull. However, a fairly small number of nukes detonated in any country in the wrong places would pretty well devastate the economy of that country for many years.


6 posted on 12/11/2006 12:10:16 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath

The internal combustion engine is so yesterday.

Now it's cattle (and the methane gas they produce).


7 posted on 12/11/2006 12:10:55 PM PST by airborne (MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! Jesus is the reason for the season!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE
"Setting off a Hiroshima-size weapon could cause as many direct fatalities as all of World War II."

WWII had total casualties of over 25 million. There isn't a population center in the world dense enough to have that many people killed from a 20 kiloton bomb.

8 posted on 12/11/2006 12:12:08 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty
Small Nuclear War Would Cause Global Environmental Catastrophe

Well, the chances of a nuclear war being small are not too good, so maybe there's hope just yet.








/sarc

9 posted on 12/11/2006 12:13:00 PM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

i like those guys

they've come up with a cure for global warming...

now, lets go to tehran for a weather report

" those clouds of billowing methane are sure to dissipate with the cold front approaching"


10 posted on 12/11/2006 12:15:29 PM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty
could plunge temperatures
viola two birds with one stone, Middle east cleaned up, global warming ends. Is this a great country or what?
11 posted on 12/11/2006 12:15:47 PM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

What were the global temperature effects of Chernobyl? Why are global tempertature effects measured in Fahrenheit? Because the numbers are bigger?


12 posted on 12/11/2006 12:16:35 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty

"They discovered the smoke emissions would plunge temperatures by about 2 degrees Fahrenheit (1.25 degrees Celsius) over large areas of North America and Eurasia—areas far removed from the countries involved in the conflict."

This is almost precisely what the late Carl Sagan and other nuclear winter proponents said about the possibility of Kuwait's oil wells being set on fire (by non-nuclear means of course) in 1991. As we know, the wells were torched, no such catastrophe ensued, and the media responded with deafening silence. To the best of my knowledge, Carl was never once called out by the media on this outrageous prediction or asked to account for it.


13 posted on 12/11/2006 12:17:13 PM PST by atomic conspiracy (Rousing the blog-rabble since 9-11-01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty
Ahhhhh, question!

Didn't we have open air nuclear testing in the late 40s and 50s? I remember seeing pictures of blasts out there in the southwestern deserts of the US.

I don't remember any planet wide catastrophes.
14 posted on 12/11/2006 12:17:17 PM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty
The lingering effects could re-shape the environment in ways never conceived. In terms of climate, a nuclear blast could plunge temperatures across large swaths of the globe.

These weasels are already bitching about Global Warming; if we really want to stop Global Warming, we could just have a small nuclear war with the next country to seriously piss us off. North Korea and Iran are on deck.

We'd stop Global Warming and stop the bad guys. Where's the downside ? (Well, except for being a Nork or an Iraniac)

15 posted on 12/11/2006 12:17:31 PM PST by Centurion2000 (If the Romans had nukes, Carthage would still be glowing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty

What about all that testing we did a few decades ago? Was that not MORE than a small theater war?


16 posted on 12/11/2006 12:19:16 PM PST by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Naziism was in 1937.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
What were the global temperature effects of Chernobyl?

I am not sure. I was thinking of the environmental impact. However, it's pretty well documented what the effects of several small nuclear bombs would be.

17 posted on 12/11/2006 12:19:52 PM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty

Let's have a SMALL nuclear war just to show them they are wrong like in global warming ( Cow farts )


18 posted on 12/11/2006 12:20:51 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty
What is the downside?
Are you trying to say you don't think a "small" nuclear war would have worldwide effects on our climate? There have been volcanic eruptions that have affected out climate for years. I'll bet the 50 nukes between India and Pakistan put orders of magnitude more junk in the atmosphere.

Maybe I'm just having a hard time with the idea of a "small" nuclear war.
19 posted on 12/11/2006 12:21:10 PM PST by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTruthAintPretty

Nuclear Winter returns!!!


20 posted on 12/11/2006 12:21:29 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson