Related thread:
Airport's trees stoking "war on Christmas". (SEATAC Update)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1751685/posts
The Rabbi let a lawyer in on the deal.
The Rabbi did not get what he wanted but he got what he asked for.
triangulation: pitting one's enemies against each other.
Does this "Rabbi" come from the Reform sect?
He should not have asked to hold a lighting ceremony which would have turned it into a religious celebration. The airport wanted to avoid a costly legal battle.
High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel, WOT
..................
Ping to the surviving thread.
High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel, WOT
..................
And it should be noted that underlying the issue is the fact that these were NOT CHRISTMAS TREES Seattle is after all inclusive by definition and the HOLIDAY TREES on display presumably represented all religions. Now there's a war on Holiday Trees. Should the H and T be capitalized now?
"What we have are holiday trees," she said. "If we are going to display symbols representing other cultures, we have to think what that means and what's respectful and what would make a good display. Maybe it would be 'Holidays of the World.'
"Or maybe it's snowmen."
Terri-Ann Betancourt , airport spokesman (spokeswoman, spokesms, whatever)
This is a Christmas Tree. Maybe someone can post a Holiday Tree. I'd like to see what they look like.
Lawsuits because of offense are the root cause of all of this PC nonsense. Being offended is not something that should be eligible to bring suit against.
The lawyer who "threatened" the lawsuit should be the one to apologize. If the Rabbi told the lawyer to threaten, he should admit such and apologize. And the wusses at the airport should apologize for being so easy to intimidate.
Then put up the Christmas trees, a Nativity scene, a Menorah, and a festivus pole and be done with this nonsense.
So did this Rabbi just give his lawyer carte blanche, or did he not give the attorney permission to use the words "federal lawsuit" for leverage to get his way?
[After two months of indecision from the Port of Seattle (the quasi-governmental agency that runs the airport) concerning the request for a menorah, the rabbis lawyer made the mistake (yes, it was a mistake) of threatening a federal lawsuit and the airport people panicked and ordered the removal of the trees. Were not in the business of offending anyone and were not eager to get into a federal lawsuit with anyone, said Craig Watson, chief lawyer for the Port of Seattle. Patricia Davis, head of the Port Commission said, We didnt have other cultures represented and rather than scramble around to find representations of other cultures at this late date, we decided to take them down and consider it later. ]
The law of unintended consequences. Threatening a federal lawsuit was assinine.
These THREATENING WORDS do NOT comport with the INNOCENT portrayal of the Rabbi.
Our country has GONE stark raving mad. I thank GOD I grew up in a different age.
Please allow *this* Jew to go on record that this rabbi AND his lawyer are idiots.
Good for Michael Medved for getting to the bottom of this!
A lawyer was hired by the Rabbi and threatened to sue Sea-Tac ... that's what went wrong
with this whole miserable affair.
Ah yes, one of the most important things that no one thinks about, unintended consequences.