Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/08/2006 3:50:13 PM PST by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bruinbirdman

Arrogant left wing elitists.


2 posted on 12/08/2006 3:51:33 PM PST by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

WHAT??????? The High Senate can't tell people what to do? I'll be dammed!


3 posted on 12/08/2006 3:56:50 PM PST by Ron2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Excellent letter. Now will anyone listen?


4 posted on 12/08/2006 3:58:52 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Who does Olympia think she is? ... A movie star?

These people have been in place for too long.


5 posted on 12/08/2006 4:00:13 PM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Defenders of free speech must stand up ... and declare that the government has no business telling Americans what they should think or say

Here Here!

7 posted on 12/08/2006 4:08:08 PM PST by Domandred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Campaign Finance Reform strikes again.


8 posted on 12/08/2006 4:10:26 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
The erroneous assumptions begin in the first paragraph:

...you will have the ability and responsibility to lead ExxonMobil toward its rightful place as a good corporate and global citizen.

For the common good... for the common good... must repeat /s

9 posted on 12/08/2006 4:13:27 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Senators' Letter Is a Violation of ExxonMobil's Freedom of Speech

Maybe I am being picky here, but that seems like an erroneous headline. The violation of their Freedom of speech would only occur if they were punished or otherwise penalized if they continue to act as they wish.

A proper response that said: "thanks, but no thanks." would be appropriate from E-M and no "violation" would have occurred.

10 posted on 12/08/2006 4:28:51 PM PST by Michael.SF. (Note: Sell Diebold Stock.................NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Olympia is not the "sharpest knife in the drawer". She's darn near as ignorant as Cantwell and Boxer.


11 posted on 12/08/2006 4:29:03 PM PST by capt. norm (Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DaveLoneRanger; Ernest_at_the_Beach

Pingworthy?


12 posted on 12/08/2006 4:34:35 PM PST by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Thursday, November 16, 2006 https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
I have updated my FMCDH (From My Cold Dead Hands) sign-off with the addition of (BITS).....Blood In The Streets, which I foresee coming soon, due to the enormous increase of the Marxist progressive movement being shoved down the throat of this failing REPUBLIC through the Judicial tyranny of fiat law, the passing of unconstitutional laws by the Legislative and Executive branches of our government and the enormous tax burden placed upon the average American to support unconstitutional programs put forth by Marxist ideology. I do not advocate revolution.

I only think of what I foresee.

Pay attention folks......

FMCDH(BITS)

14 posted on 12/08/2006 4:46:10 PM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Two more posturing idiots, ignoring, denying, the gathering storm.

Nucular Islamo-Fascism vs. Global Warming. Choose wisely, grasshopper.

16 posted on 12/08/2006 4:49:50 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
"That is a message appropriate to a dictator, not to the representatives of a free nation."

Well,
yeah,
I think that has been suggested more than once on FR.

20 posted on 12/08/2006 5:14:16 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman


When we said "free speech" - we didn't mean for those who disagree.

-the American Left


21 posted on 12/08/2006 5:49:43 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Become dhimmis to the anti-truth, anti-freedom "Convenient Opinion" Collective.


22 posted on 12/08/2006 5:51:18 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson