Would you happen to another interpretation for the second amendment to the Constitution, too? The 14th amendment is rather straightforward.
I'll just leave the interpretation to those who are responsible for these amendments and the laws they enacted to carry out their amendments. You koolaid drinkers don't even have a solid supreme court ruling addressing either of these 2 amendments, yet want to replace the legislative history with your own ignorant bias.
No one has yet explained how national law and the citizenship clause were so radically changed in the 1960's without the constitution ever being amended.