Skip to comments.
Rumsfeld faces personal suit by detainees
MSNBC ^
| Dec, 8, 2006
| Joel Seidman
Posted on 12/07/2006 8:25:44 PM PST by FairOpinion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
I hope the judge throws the suit out immediately.
This is a travesty.
the ACLU - what a surprise.
To: FairOpinion
I would love to see members of the ACLU placed into the hands of our enemies, and then have them experience the true meaning of "torture". What a bunch of money grubbing ambulance chasers.
2
posted on
12/07/2006 8:29:54 PM PST
by
SoldierDad
(Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier back in the "SandBox")
To: FairOpinion
First let's see the complainant in court ~ Sec. Rumsfeld has the right to confront his accusers.
Then, just announce the time and place.
They are, of course, enemy forces who were released to wonder about by the courts or other fools ~ and if the government won't take action to protect us, then there are undoubtedly public spirited citizens who will do the job for them.
3
posted on
12/07/2006 8:30:05 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: FairOpinion
Wouldn't it be nice if a bunch of Americans got together and sued these camel-riding maggots AND THEIR "LAWYERS" for participating in the jihad against America?
4
posted on
12/07/2006 8:31:25 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Study hard and do your homework or you'll end up stuck in the House or Senate.)
To: FairOpinion
God Almighty. Thanks stay-at-home idiots and vote-for-democrats-just-to-show-them imbeciles. You've got what you ordered and the next course is better yet - your freedom served on a nice platter of your nation when it had a principal.
5
posted on
12/07/2006 8:32:12 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(Let's not ruin this moment with words.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
"bunch of Americans got together and sued these camel-riding maggots AND THEIR "LAWYERS" for participating in the jihad against America?"
===
THAT would be a much more valid law suit, than the one they are bringing against Rumsfeld.
The US should have shot all the prisoners, now they couldn't be running around suing us. No good deed goes unpunished.
To: muawiyah
>> First let's see the complainant in court ~ Sec. Rumsfeld has the right to confront his accusers.
Which accusers are you referring to: libs, media, or terrorists?
7
posted on
12/07/2006 8:37:39 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
To: muawiyah
I would sure pay to be in court the day that Rummy would testify.
8
posted on
12/07/2006 8:38:29 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Bolton/Cheney (that would be Lynne) 08)
To: STARWISE; Bahbah; Mo1; OldFriend; MNJohnnie; Peach; sofaman; Howlin
9
posted on
12/07/2006 8:39:36 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Bolton/Cheney (that would be Lynne) 08)
To: FairOpinion
subjecting them to "torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, including severe and repeated beatings, cutting with knives, sexual humiliation and assault, confinement in a wooden box, forcible sleep and sensory deprivation, mock executions, death threats, and restraint in contorted and excruciating positions," according to court documents.
I know it wrong, but 'confinement in a wooden box' for one of these cretins brings a small grin to my face.
10
posted on
12/07/2006 8:40:47 PM PST
by
kinoxi
To: kinoxi
Just don't forget that the terrorist handbook instructs them to claim torture, and that terrorists lie a lot.
I bet most of the things they claim never happened.
To: FairOpinion
I knew this same group was trying to bring charges against him in Germany...I didn't know about here.
Please don't tell me that Rummy resigning has allowed them to file these charges here...ugh
12
posted on
12/07/2006 8:42:43 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Bolton/Cheney (that would be Lynne) 08)
To: Jaysun
"Thanks stay-at-home idiots and vote-for-democrats-just-to-show-them imbeciles."
I feel about the same way.
They are pushing the country into disaster literally, just to massage their own egos.
To: Cindy
To: FairOpinion
I know much of what they 'claimed' never happened. I liked the mental picture that quote gave me, that's all...
15
posted on
12/07/2006 8:47:42 PM PST
by
kinoxi
To: FairOpinion
>>The US should have shot all the prisoners, now they couldn't be running around suing us. No good deed goes unpunished.
Do you mean enemy fighters on the battlefield?
No suits, no transportation costs, no medical costs, no food costs, no cost for soccer balls, no printing expenditures, ...
It certainly begs the question of which is more expedient: interrogation or sweeping continuous combat operations. I'm guessing the interrogation process hoped to minimize overall war casualties, but like you said ...
... No good deed goes unpunished.
... No good deed goes unpunished.
... No good deed goes unpunished.
... No good deed goes unpunished.
To: kinoxi
To: Txsleuth
The President should step in and declare them DOA!
18
posted on
12/07/2006 8:52:09 PM PST
by
TheLion
(We are not the health maintenance organization for Mexico)
To: FairOpinion
During the Huk terrorist insurgency in the Phillipines following WWII any terr caught out of uniform was executed. It has been this way during most wars and insurgencies. I believe that it is supported by the Geneva Conventions.
Now they sue Rummy. He is a Patriot and we were lucky to have him serve. Let these poor little jihadis thank mohammed(may pigs be upon him)they aren't pushin up daisies.
Know how the enlightened do that moHAMmed(mpbuh) thing? Howzabout(mpgsbuh)(may pigs be upon him)?
19
posted on
12/07/2006 8:55:03 PM PST
by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
"Wouldn't it be nice if a bunch of Americans got together and sued these camel-riding maggots AND THEIR "LAWYERS" for participating in the jihad against America?"
--------
Was the Baker Commission bought off by the Saudis?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1750206/posts
Lawyers in the Riyadh office have served in community positions throughout Riyadh and Saudi Arabia as a whole. For example, since 1996 we have had lawyers acting as general counsel for the National U.S.-Arab Chamber of Commerce and the Saudi Arabia country coordinator for the American Bar Association's Section on International Law and Practice. In addition, the perspective and experience of James A. Baker III, 61st U.S. Secretary of State and 67th U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, and Robert W. Jordan, who recently served as U.S. Ambassador to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, offer our clients additional resources on which to rely in the region
Could this have had an influence on the Baker report? There was not one Military person on the commission, nor did they interview any Military person.
------
Who are you gunna call? Ghostbusters?
20
posted on
12/07/2006 8:58:50 PM PST
by
Fred Nerks
(MEDIA + ENEMY = ENEMEDIA!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson